Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation and expansion of the hydrofornia building in Przecław for civil defense warehouses

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00170333/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Podkarpackie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Podkarpackie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation and expansion of the hydrofornia building in Przecław for civil defense warehouses

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

8 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Insulation of building partitions:
--Insulation of external walls on the ground floor
--Insulation of external walls on the first floor
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8a4a-275b-bb28-056e-e50001aab27b.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the reconstruction and expansion of a hydrofornia building in Przecław for civil defense warehouses, with submissions required electronically.

Załącznik Nr 5 Oswiadczenie Wykonawców wspólnie ubiegających się o udzielenie za...DOC
Załącznik Nr 5 Oswiadczenie Wykonawców wspóln...

This document contains a template for a declaration by contractors jointly applying for a public procurement, specifying their roles and scope of work for the reconstruction and expansion of a hydrofornia building in Przecław.

Załącznik Nr 6 Wzór wykazu robót budowlanych.docxDOC
Załącznik Nr 6 Wzór wykazu robót budowlanych....

This document contains a template for listing construction works performed by a bidder within the last 5 years, required for the tender concerning the renovation and expansion of a hydrofornia building in Przecław for civil defense warehouses.

Załącznik Nr 7 Wzór wykazu osób.docxDOC
Załącznik Nr 7 Wzór wykazu osób.docx

This document contains a template for listing personnel to be assigned to the reconstruction and expansion of a hydrofornia building in Przecław for civil defense warehouses.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for civil defense warehouse construction offers clear documentation and a reasonable process, though financial details and specific evaluation criteria are missing. The use of e-procurement is positive, but sustainability aspects are not explicitly addressed.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general regulatory requirements with a proper CPV code and an active status. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. Deadlines are present, but their reasonableness is debatable given the scope. No disputes are indicated.

Procedure type not specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the reconstruction and expansion of the hydrofornia building is clear. While essential documents like the contract draft and detailed scope are provided, specific evaluation criteria are missing, which impacts the clarity of how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and CPV. Deadlines and the general nature of the project are specified. However, the estimated value and contract duration are not disclosed, and critical eligibility and exclusion grounds are absent.

Estimated value not disclosed
Contract duration not specified
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, promoting accessibility. All documents appear to be accessible, and the use of standardized forms is positive. Criteria for evaluation are not specified, which is a significant concern for fairness. No requirements are tailored to specific companies.

Evaluation criteria not specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is flagged as e-procurement, implying e-submission. The contract start date is not explicitly stated. Financing information is absent, and the duration of the contract is missing, which affects practical planning for bidders.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The submission deadline is logically placed after the publication date. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The date of the tender publication is missing.

Missing reveal date
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. Therefore, sustainability criteria are not met.

No explicit green procurement mentioned
No explicit social aspects mentioned

Strengths

Clear project description and objective
E-Procurement utilized
Comprehensive set of tender documents provided (forms, contract draft)
Proper CPV code assigned

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration and start date
Absence of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify the evaluation criteria and weighting.
2. Disclose the estimated contract value and duration for better bidder assessment.
3. Integrate sustainability criteria into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline