Skip to main content
Tenders

Creation of genetic material preservation capacity and corresponding data management capacity within the framework of the animal genetic resources conservation program

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
303925
Value
€50,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 11, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Description of Service Provision40%
Total Cost40%
Bidder's Team and Work Distribution20%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€50,000
Duration
60 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€40,919
Avg. Bids
1.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
95%
495 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to create the capacity to receive, accept for storage, and store genetic material collected from animals belonging to breeds listed in the list of endangered breeds, in compliance with biosafety requirements, and to collect and store relevant information.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Submit the bid according to the required structure.
--Provide detailed description of the service.
--Provide detailed description of containers.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must confirm they meet all tender conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must confirm they meet all tender conditions.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Provide detailed description of the service.
--Provide detailed description of containers.
--Provide detailed description of data management.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The total cost will be a significant evaluation criterion.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
303925_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.6 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with all tender conditions, provide detailed descriptions of the service, containers, and data management, and submit the bid according to the required structure.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
303925_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 6.2 KB

The contracting authority will evaluate bids based on total cost, service provision description, and bidder's team and work distribution, with total cost having the largest weight.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
303925_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.9 KB

The procurement pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses, but is not intended for completion itself.

Riigihanke alusdokumendidPDF
Riigihanke_alusdokumendid.pdf -- 1.9 MB

The Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture invites bids for establishing genetic material storage and data management capabilities, with evaluation criteria including service description, team, and total cost.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for genetic material storage capabilities is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could benefit from more detailed documentation regarding financing conditions.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the provision of a CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and the estimated value is disclosed. No disputes are noted. The financing condition is stated to be in the contract draft, which is acceptable but could be more explicit.

Clarity80/100

The tender's objective is clearly stated, and the requirements for technical capability (service, containers, data management) are outlined. Evaluation criteria are mentioned, though the weighting of 'total cost' as a significant factor is noted. The description of the service is understandable.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the 'Location Info' is vague ('Täpne piirkond määramata' - Exact region not specified), and while financing conditions are mentioned as being in the contract draft, explicit details are missing from the tender notice itself.

Vague location information
Lack of explicit financing details in the tender notice
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed. Criteria are objective (cost, service, team). The requirement for staff qualification is standard. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting a fair competition.

Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is mandated, which is practical. The contract duration is specified. However, the financing condition is only referenced in the contract draft, and the 'Contract start date' is not explicitly provided in the tender notice, which could be a point of minor inconvenience.

Financing conditions referenced only in contract draft
Missing explicit contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is clear.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation)

Strengths

Clear objective and scope
Electronic submission and e-procurement
Reasonable estimated value and contract duration
Objective evaluation criteria

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Vague location information
Financing conditions not detailed in the tender notice

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility).
2. Provide more precise location details or criteria for the service area.
3. Include a summary of key financing conditions or a direct link to the contract draft within the tender notice.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline