Skip to main content
Tenders

Purchase of a laser cutting machine (Tallinn College of Technology)

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
303796
Value
€115,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Total bid cost100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 19, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€115,000
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€91,816
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
473 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the public procurement is to acquire a laser cutting machine for Tallinn College of Technology to ensure the modern technological base required for vocational training within the framework of the engineering academy project. The machine is necessary for conducting modern vocational training that meets current labor market demands in the metalworking field, including teaching precision machining and cutting operations. The laser cutting machine will enable the training of students in the use of high-tech equipment, meeting the expectations of industrial automation and digitalization levels. The availability of the machine is essential for conducting realistic practical exercises corresponding to the working world and preparing qualified labor for the manufacturing sector.
Green ProcurementEU FundedElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on total cost.
--The tender is not divided into lots, as the subject of the procurement is a single laser cutting machine.
--Joint bids are permitted.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must not engage subcontractors or suppliers connected with the Russian Federation.
--All subcontractors and suppliers must be located in EU or EEA countries or countries that have acceded to the WTO Government Procurement Agreement.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must confirm their eligibility through a self-declaration (Hankepass).
--Bidders must submit the ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) in .xml format.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must provide a detailed technical description of the offered laser cutting machine.
--Bidders must confirm compliance with all presented requirements.
--Bidders must submit necessary information materials.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total cost of the bid will be the primary evaluation criterion.
--The lowest price will receive the maximum score.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
303796_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 12.2 KB

Bidders must confirm they will not engage subcontractors or suppliers linked to the Russian Federation, and that all subcontractors and suppliers are located in EU/EEA countries or WTO GPA member states.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 37.0 KB

Bidders must provide a detailed technical description of the offered laser cutting machine, confirming compliance with all stated requirements and submitting necessary informational materials.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
303796_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

In the tender for the purchase of a laser cutting machine, bids will be evaluated primarily based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
303796_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 68.4 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, required for tender participation, but is filled out electronically.

Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt.doc -- 110.0 KB

The draft contract outlines the terms and legal framework of the agreement, essential for tender submission.

LisateaveDOC
Lisateave.docx -- 34.7 KB

This document clarifies tender procedure details, including lot division, joint submissions, business secret marking, bid language, and grounds for tender cancellation.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a laser cutting machine is generally well-structured with clear technical and eligibility requirements. However, it lacks specific details on social and innovation aspects, and the financing condition explanation could be more direct.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of proper CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable. The financing condition explanation is a bit verbose but ultimately indicates the contract becomes effective upon signing.

Clarity80/100

The description of the laser cutting machine's purpose is clear, and technical requirements are documented. Evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, with cost being primary. Conditions for participation are generally well-defined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents like the draft contract and technical specifications are attached. However, the financing condition explanation is somewhat convoluted.

Fairness85/100

The tender is open to joint bids and uses e-procurement. The exclusion criteria related to the Russian Federation are standard for current geopolitical contexts and not company-specific. The primary evaluation criterion being total cost is objective.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are mandated. The contract start date is provided, though the financing condition explanation is slightly unclear. The duration is specified. A URL for the opening place is provided.

The explanation for the 'Financing Condition' is verbose and could be more direct.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and value are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically presented.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, but there are no specific criteria or requirements detailed within the provided text to support this. Social aspects and innovation are not explicitly addressed.

Lack of specific details on 'Green Procurement' requirements.
Absence of explicit social or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear technical and eligibility requirements
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement
Objective primary evaluation criterion (total cost)
EU Funded status indicated

Concerns

Lack of specific sustainability (green procurement) criteria
Vague explanation for financing condition
No explicit mention of social or innovation aspects

Recommendations

1. Elaborate on the specific 'Green Procurement' requirements.
2. Clarify the financing condition explanation for better understanding.
3. Consider incorporating specific social or innovation criteria if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline