Skip to main content
Tenders

Hydrology Training Programme

Open
Deadline
31 days left
April 28, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027489-2026
Value
£240,000
Location
Inner London - West, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 21, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 28, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£240,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Inner London - West
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Environment Agency requires the delivery of its Hydrology Training Programme to maintain and enhance technical resilience. This programme was established following the Hydrology Review (2008), which identified hydrology as a critical business risk and a scarce skill within the Environment Agency.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a Hydrology Training Programme is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a disclosed estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and technical requirements, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal compliance by providing a clear procedure (open procedure), a proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The absence of a reveal date is a minor issue.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the programme's purpose is clear, stemming from a past review. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed technical, financial, and submission requirements leaves significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
No specific technical capability requirements listed
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and start date. However, the absence of detailed requirements and the fact that none of the attached documents have content significantly reduces completeness.

No document content available
No specific requirements listed across several categories
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad access. The value is disclosed, and the deadline is specified. The lack of specific, objective criteria for evaluation and the absence of detailed requirements could be perceived as less fair, but there are no overt signs of tailoring to specific companies.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and financing details limits its practicality for bidders.

No e-submission mentioned
Financing information not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical within the context of the tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Open procedure for broad participation
Estimated value and duration disclosed
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Lack of specific evaluation criteria
Absence of detailed technical, financial, and submission requirements
No document content available
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency.
2. Specify technical, financial, and submission requirements for clarity and fairness.
3. Include information on sustainability aspects if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline