Skip to main content
Tenders

Mapping of Trees in Tallinn

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
302744
Value
€150,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 11, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Understanding of work outcomes and client needs45%
Bid cost35%
Risk mitigation20%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€150,000
Duration
9 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,415
Avg. Bids
4.8
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
2,006 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The detailed description of the subject of the procurement contract is provided in the technical specification (RHAD Annex 1).
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (4)
Technical (4)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bidders must submit a bid that demonstrates understanding of work results, client needs, risk mitigation, and competitive cost.
--The bid will be evaluated based on quality (70%) and cost (30%).
--The evaluation methodology focuses on understanding the technical solution and risk mitigation.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must confirm adherence to tender conditions, including fair competition and representation rights.
--Joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must understand the work results.
--Bidders must understand the client's needs.
--Bidders must demonstrate risk mitigation.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The service is a comprehensive whole and cannot be divided into parts.
--The mapping of Tallinn's street trees must be carried out.
--Data on street trees must be collected and processed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Competitive cost is a factor in the evaluation.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
302744_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.9 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with tender conditions, including fair competition and representation rights, and joint bidders must submit a power of attorney.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
302744_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.2 KB

Bidders must submit a proposal covering understanding of work outcomes, client needs, risk mitigation, and competitive pricing, with evaluation criteria weighted 70% for quality and 30% for cost.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
302744_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.6 KB

This tender pass guides companies interested in the Tallinn tree mapping tender, clarifying qualification requirements and expected responses.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 488.3 KB

The contractor must map Tallinn's street trees, collect and process data about them to support the city's green space planning and maintenance, utilizing modern technologies and machine learning.

Lisa 2 Lepingu tingimusedPDF
Lisa 2 Lepingu tingimused.pdf -- 250.2 KB

This document outlines the contract terms governing the execution of the Tallinn tree mapping tender, including the rights and obligations of the parties and the hierarchy of contractual documents.

Lisa 3 Hindamismetoodika kirjeldus ja hindamislehtPDF
Lisa 3 Hindamismetoodika kirjeldus.pdf -- 133.0 KB

This document outlines the evaluation methodology and criteria for assessing bids in the Tallinn Tree Mapping tender, focusing on understanding the technical solution and risk mitigation.

Riigihanke alusdokumentPDF
Riigihanke alusdokument.pdf -- 107.2 KB

The tender's foundational document outlines the terms, requirements, and procedures for the open procurement of Tallinn's tree mapping, including qualification rules and exclusion grounds.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Tallinn's tree mapping is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable evaluation weighting. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies on external documents for full detail.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear CPV code and a reasonable timeline. The procedure type 'A' (Open Procedure) is appropriate. No immediate legal red flags are apparent, but full compliance relies on the content of the attached 'Riigihanke alusdokument'.

Clarity80/100

The core service is clearly described, and the use of technical specifications and evaluation methodology documents provides detailed guidance. The requirement for bidders to understand work results, client needs, and risk mitigation is well-articulated.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the full technical details are in 'Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus' and 'Tehnilise kirjelduse lisa 1', which are not fully accessible for AI analysis, impacting the perceived completeness of the provided tender data.

Full technical details are in external documents not fully analyzed.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the evaluation criteria (70% quality, 30% cost) are clearly stated with a focus on understanding the technical solution and risk mitigation, which promotes objective assessment. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are mandated, which is positive. However, the contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is limited to the estimated value. The duration is specified.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated consistently. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While the use of modern technologies and machine learning could be considered innovative, it is not explicitly framed as such. The funding source (EU) is not specified.

No explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.

Strengths

Clear technical requirements and evaluation criteria.
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Well-defined CPV code and open procedure.
Objective evaluation weighting (quality vs. cost).

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability or innovation focus.
Reliance on external documents for full technical detail.
Missing explicit contract start date.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability or innovation objectives into the tender requirements.
2. Ensure all critical technical specifications are directly accessible or summarized within the main tender documents.
3. Clearly state the intended contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline