Skip to main content
Tenders

Purchase of quad bikes

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
163583
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 10, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
10 months
Location
Riga
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€168,348
Avg. Bids
1.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
4,060 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of quad bikes
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must complete the bidder's application form.
--Submission deadline: 2026-03-31T10:00:00
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not have participated in a criminal organization.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must provide information on convictions and any self-cleaning measures.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Technical specifications for quadricycles are detailed in the 'Nolikums' document.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Financial proposal guidelines are outlined in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības' documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 2.versijaPDF
163583_PD.ANY_1_2_1_20260309114700.pdf -- 100.4 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders participating in a tender for the procurement of quad bikes, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical specifications, and financial proposal guidelines.

ESPDXML
espd-request_2026_06.xml -- 143.0 KB

This document contains a European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request concerning participation in a criminal organization, requiring bidders to provide information on convictions and any self-cleaning measures.

Nolikums ar grozījumiemZIP
Groz.Nolikums_2026_06.zip -- 2.9 MB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender for the purchase of quad bikes, including technical specifications, submission requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
163583_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260227051205.pdf -- 100.4 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders participating in a tender for the procurement of quad bikes, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical specifications, and financial proposal requirements.

NolikumsZIP
Nolikums_2026_06.zip -- 2.9 MB

This document contains a technical specification for quadricycles and a bidder's application form for a tender.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the main data for an open tender procedure for the procurement of quad bikes by the State Security Agency, with a submission deadline of March 31, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for quadricycle procurement is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks transparency in financial value and specific evaluation criteria. Document access appears restricted, impacting overall fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and active status. Deadlines are reasonable. However, the lack of disclosed value and potential for restricted document access could raise concerns regarding full regulatory adherence.

Value not disclosed
Restricted document access
Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear title, description, and references to technical specifications within attached documents. Mandatory exclusion and eligibility requirements are outlined. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria hinders complete clarity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including organization, type, procedure, and contract duration. Key documents are attached. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the specific evaluation criteria are missing, impacting completeness.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement and has objective criteria for exclusion and eligibility. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag significantly impacts fairness, as does the undisclosed value, which prevents a full assessment of the tender's scope. The absence of specific evaluation criteria also reduces transparency.

Restricted document access
Value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a specified contract start date implied by the submission deadline. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and while e-procurement is indicated, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests potential practical limitations for bidders.

No e-submission
Financing info not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded' which can imply adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and procedure clearly specified
CPV code provided
Multiple relevant documents attached
Reasonable submission deadline

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Potential lack of e-submission functionality

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the procurement.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline