Skip to main content
Tenders

Purchase, configuration, and implementation of a log center system and SZBI documentation for the Municipality of Sędziszów

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00162697/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Świętokrzyskie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Świętokrzyskie
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€481,261
Avg. Bids
1.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
92%
2,720 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase, configuration, and implementation of a log center system and SZBI documentation for the Municipality of Sędziszów

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Delivery, configuration, and implementation of a central system for collecting, processing, and analyzing logs from the Ordering Party's IT systems and network devices, including necessary hardware, software, documentation, and administrator training.
--The system must enable central monitoring of security events, their analysis, reporting, and alert generation.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de85ae-53df-0f51-056e-e500011b8589.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for the purchase, configuration, and implementation of a log center system and IT security documentation for the Municipality of Sędziszów.

SWZ.pdfPDF
SWZ.pdf

This document contains the Specifications of the Order Conditions (SWZ) for the purchase, configuration, and implementation of a log center system and ISMS documentation for the Municipality of Sędziszów.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a log center system is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable CPV code. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal requirements with a proper CPV code and active status. The procedure is not explicitly defined beyond 'Dostawy' (Supplies), which is acceptable for this type of procurement. The submission deadline is relatively short, which could be a minor concern for some bidders.

Submission deadline may be too short
Clarity80/100

The description of the required system is clear, outlining the core functionalities of log collection, processing, analysis, and alert generation. The attached documents, including the SWZ, provide detailed specifications for the subject of the order.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and CPV code. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details such as contract duration and financing information are missing, which affects the overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, with a clear CPV code and the use of e-procurement. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies. The disclosure of the value is missing, which is a slight detractor from full transparency.

Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the absence of a specified contract start date and financing details makes it less practical for bidders to fully assess their resource allocation and financial planning.

Missing contract start date
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no indications of disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of the required system
Proper CPV code provided
Use of e-procurement
Comprehensive set of attached documents (SWZ, forms, etc.)

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Short submission deadline
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline to allow for more thorough preparation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline