Skip to main content
Tenders

Regenerative Schools Programme - Technical and Academic advisors

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
022607-2026
Value
£4,000,000
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£4,000,000
Duration
44 months
Location
North East England
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Department for Education and the Education Estates Strategy. The Department for Education (DfE) is the UK government’s Department responsible for the schools in England. As part of this role, we oversee the safety, condition, and long‑term sustainability of the education estate. This includes ensuring that current and future school buildings are provided with safe, high‑quality environments where children can learn and thrive. On 11th February 2026 the Department published its 10-year plan for the Education Estate, the Education Estates Strategy, A decade of national renewal. The Regenerative Schools Pilot was outlined within the strategy: “Testing new solutions, technologies and construction methods – we will continue to look at how we can go further for our future design specifications as part of a research and development programme supported by £33 million to 2029-30. This will prioritise regenerative approaches looking at a wide range of outcomes from energy storage to bio-based construction materials, such as timber and working closely with Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) on the Timber in Construction Road Map.” This is your opportunity to shape this cutting‑edge project, which will guide the Department’s work over the next ten years and beyond. Regenerative Schools Pilot, Introduction: The Department for Education intends to research, develop, and deliver a series of single and dual classroom, ultra‑low‑carbon school buildings under the Regenerative Schools Programme. This will be accompanied by a package of landscaping and retrofit interventions which will support biodiversity, passive heat‑reduction (such as tree shading), fabric upgrades to existing buildings (cladding and windows), sustainable drainage systems and the creation of outdoor learning spaces. This programme will also produce case studies, guidance and resources for schools. As part of the Regenerative Schools Programme, the Department intends to appoint two parties in August 2026: an Innovation Lead and an Academic Adviser. These organisations will produce feasibility studies, research the building materials and techniques required to produce ultra‑low‑carbon school buildings and develop 6 standard designs. Then, in March 2027, the Department plans to appoint a contractor to deliver the works, using the materials and methods specified by the Innovation Lead and Academic Advisers. Separate market engagement and tender events will be held for the construction contractor’s appointment. The Innovation Lead: The Innovation Lead will serve as the Department’s primary technical partner, guiding the programme from its earliest feasibility work through to the delivery of completed buildings. Your work will include developing an understanding of each school site, identifying opportunities for nature‑led retrofit, and delivering 6 standardised concept designs for new single and dual external classroom pods, ultra‑low‑carbon buildings that meet demanding embodied carbon targets. You will explore and develop a range of regenerative material strategies, produce clear and accessible design material, and provide the technical direction needed to ensure that the Department’s ambitions for low embodied carbon, buildability and replicability are embedded from the outset. As the programme moves from concept into development, the Innovation Lead will take on a client‑side assurance role, overseeing the Contractor’s design under the Pre‑Contract Services Agreement and ensuring alignment with carbon targets, safety standards, and the Department’s technical requirements. During the delivery phase you will provide project management and technical assurance, monitor the quality of off‑site manufacture and on‑site installation, support statutory compliance, and ensure that handover, commissioning, and early operation run smoothly. You will also be responsible for producing technical guidance, case studies, and updated documentation so that learning from the programme can be scaled across the wider education estate. Working with the Academic Adviser: The Innovation Lead and Academic Adviser are intended to operate in parallel, each with a distinct focus but with close coordination throughout. The Innovation Lead will ensure technical feasibility, safety, and low‑carbon performance, while the Academic Adviser will ensure that the programme responds to the needs and experiences of the schools and communities involved. Together you will provide the Department with the combined academic, social, and technical expertise required to develop a set of replicable, ultra‑low‑carbon solutions that are grounded in real‑world school environments and capable of informing future national delivery. Please refer to the engagement section of this notice to register for our market engagement events.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

22 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (16)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders are invited to register for market engagement events. Specific submission requirements for the tender itself are not detailed in this extract. Separate market engagement and tender events will be held for the construction contractor’s appointment.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be an organization capable of undertaking the role of an Innovation Lead.
--Must be able to operate in close coordination with an Academic Adviser.
--Must be able to provide combined academic, social, and technical expertise.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS16
--Ability to guide a programme from feasibility work through to the delivery of completed buildings.
--Experience in developing an understanding of school sites.
--Experience in identifying opportunities for nature-led retrofit.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text. The value of the tender is 4,000,000 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is for regenerative school program advisory services, offering a good level of detail on requirements but lacking specific evaluation criteria and document content, impacting overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to be in a 'planning' stage, which explains the absence of a specific procedure type and liable person. The CPV code is relevant. Deadlines are provided, but the short submission window from the notice date (assuming the date is the publication date, not the planning date) to the deadline is a potential concern regarding reasonableness for complex advisory services. No disputes are indicated.

Submission deadline might be too short relative to the planning date.
Clarity80/100

The description provides a comprehensive overview of the program's goals, context, and the roles of the Innovation Lead and Academic Adviser. Technical and eligibility requirements are reasonably well-defined within the text, offering a good understanding of the expected expertise.

Completeness70/100

Key information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are present. However, crucial tender documents are not accessible, and evaluation criteria are missing, significantly reducing completeness for potential bidders.

No tender document content available.
Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness85/100

The tender details the estimated value and the scope of work clearly. Requirements appear to be performance-based and focused on expertise rather than favouring specific companies. The mention of market engagement events suggests an effort towards transparency and early stakeholder involvement. However, the lack of explicitly stated objective evaluation criteria can be a point of concern for fairness.

No explicit evaluation criteria are provided.
Practicality65/100

The tender mentions market engagement events which implies a process for interested parties. However, the primary submission method is not specified (e.g., e-submission platform), and the availability of actual tender documents is a significant barrier to practical engagement. Financing details are not explicitly stated beyond the overall estimated value.

Specific e-submission process not detailed.
No document content available, hindering practical assessment.
Data Consistency90/100

Most key fields are populated, including title, reference, organization, value, and timelines. The 'planning' status is consistent with the lack of a defined procedure. No suspension or disputes are noted. The dates provided appear logical within the planning context.

Sustainability50/100

The core of the program is 'regenerative' and 'ultra-low-carbon,' indicating a strong focus on environmental aspects. However, the tender notice does not explicitly detail requirements for green procurement certifications, social value considerations beyond the program's inherent goals, or explicitly state if it's EU funded.

No explicit mention of green procurement criteria.
No explicit mention of social value criteria.

Strengths

Clear program vision and ambitious sustainability goals.
Detailed description of roles and technical requirements.
Good basic information provided (title, reference, value, duration).

Concerns

Missing crucial tender documents and evaluation criteria.
Potentially short submission deadline for the planning stage.
Lack of explicit e-submission details.

Recommendations

1. Provide access to all tender documents and clearly state evaluation criteria.
2. Review and potentially extend the submission deadline to allow adequate bidder preparation.
3. Specify the e-submission platform and process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline