Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Kõrveküla Primary School energy storage

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
301464
Value
€50,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 27, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of design and construction of the storage system (excluding VAT)80%
Storage system in an alternative location20%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€50,000
Duration
4 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Design and construction of an electrical energy storage solution for Kõrveküla Primary School.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for an energy storage system at Kõrveküla Primary School is heavily cost-driven with a low estimated value. Success hinges on a highly competitive price, meticulous adherence to technical specifications, and demonstrating robust project management within the tight 4-month timeframe. While no explicit social or innovative aspects are required, demonstrating value beyond the lowest price through efficient design and execution will be key.

Key Winning Messages

Cost-Effective, Reliable Energy Storage Solution Delivered On Time

Expert Design and Installation for Kõrveküla Primary School's Energy Needs

Key Opportunities
Leverage the 'or equivalent' clause for components and standards to optimize cost without compromising quality.
Focus on efficient project management to ensure timely delivery within the 4-month window, mitigating risks associated with coordination.
Capitalize on the cost-centric evaluation by offering a lean, efficient solution that minimizes overheads.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to cost-centric evaluation and low estimated value.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings without sacrificing quality. Explore 'or equivalent' options for components. Streamline internal processes for maximum efficiency.

Meeting the strict 4-month delivery deadline for a design and build project.

Develop a detailed project plan with clear milestones and resource allocation. Proactively identify and mitigate potential delays. Ensure strong communication channels with the contracting authority.

Potential for ambiguity in technical specifications if not thoroughly reviewed.

Scrutinize the 'Tehniline kirjeldus' document meticulously. Submit clarifying questions early in the procurement process if any aspect is unclear.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A small to medium-sized enterprise (SME) with proven experience in electrical installation and energy storage systems, capable of rapid design and construction. They should possess strong project management skills to deliver within the 4-month timeframe and a lean operational structure to offer a highly competitive price. Experience with public sector projects in Estonia is advantageous.
Key Requirements
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds
Confirmation of eligibility requirements
Detailed technical specifications and standards (from 'Tehniline kirjeldus')
Completion within 4 months duration
Competitive pricing for design and construction
Accurate completion of 'Hankepass' (ESPD)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated ability to deliver complex electrical installations within tight deadlines.
A highly competitive and transparent pricing structure.
Proactive communication and project management approach.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a commitment to using local suppliers for materials where feasible, contributing to the local economy. This can be a subtle differentiator if competitors do not address it.
Bid Focus Areas
Cost of design and construction

Offer the most competitive price possible by optimizing design and sourcing. Clearly itemize costs to demonstrate transparency and value.

Cost of an alternative location solution

If the technical specifications allow for flexibility in location, present a cost-effective alternative that meets all requirements, demonstrating foresight and cost-saving potential.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Analyze 'Tehniline kirjeldus'
CriticalHigh effort

Dedicate significant time to understanding every detail of the technical specifications. Identify any areas where 'or equivalent' can be leveraged to reduce costs without compromising performance or compliance.

Ensures compliance, identifies cost-saving opportunities, and prevents potential rejections.
Develop a Highly Competitive Price
CriticalHigh effort

Given the cost-centric evaluation, meticulously calculate all costs, including design, materials, labor, and overheads. Aim for the lowest possible price that still allows for a reasonable profit margin and ensures quality.

Directly impacts the evaluation score and increases the likelihood of winning.
Create a Detailed 4-Month Project Plan
CriticalMed effort

Develop a granular project schedule with clear milestones, dependencies, and resource allocation. Proactively identify potential bottlenecks and develop contingency plans to ensure on-time completion.

Demonstrates capability to meet the deadline and mitigates risks of delays.
Accurate 'Hankepass' (ESPD) Completion
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the 'Hankepass' is completed accurately and comprehensively, providing all requested self-declarations and information in the specified format. Any errors or omissions can lead to exclusion.

Prevents disqualification and demonstrates attention to detail.
Highlight Project Management Expertise
MediumLow effort

Emphasize the bidder's proven track record in managing similar projects efficiently and delivering on time. Showcase robust communication protocols and reporting mechanisms.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to execute the project successfully.
Submit Clarifying Questions Early
MediumLow effort

If any aspect of the tender documents, particularly the technical specifications, is unclear, submit formal clarifying questions to the contracting authority well before the deadline.

Ensures full understanding, prevents misinterpretations, and can reveal opportunities or constraints.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider without compromising on essential quality and compliance. Emphasize lean operations and efficient project delivery to justify the competitive pricing. Highlight experience in delivering similar projects within tight timelines.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (4)
Technical (3)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The tender is for the design and construction of the Kõrveküla Põhikooli energy storage system.
--The duration of the contract is 4 months.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-13 09:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--References to standards, technical approvals, technical control systems, etc. must be read as supplemented by "or equivalent".
--References to sources of purchase, processes, brands, patents, types, origin, manufacturing methods, labels, or test reports/certificates issued by conformity assessment bodies must be read as supplemented by "or equivalent".
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must confirm compliance with conditions.
--If applicable, submit a power of attorney for joint bidders.
--Describe business secrets.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender concerns the design and construction of an energy storage system for Kõrveküla Põhikool.
--Detailed technical specifications and standards are provided in the technical description document.
--The contract is for a single, indivisible unit, making division into lots technically overly complex and risky for proper execution due to coordination needs.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The tender will be evaluated based on cost.
--Key considerations for evaluation include the cost of design and construction, and the cost of an alternative location solution.
--The estimated value of the tender is 50,000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
301464_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.5 KB

Bidders must confirm compliance with conditions, submit a joint bidder authorization if applicable, and describe trade secrets, adhering to principles of equivalence.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
301464_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.5 KB

The tender evaluates the bid price, with the cost of design and construction, as well as the cost of an alternative location solution, being the primary considerations.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
301464_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 37.3 KB

The procurement pass (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as initial proof instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's conditions and the expected response format.

Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Tehniline kirjeldus 270326.doc -- 72.5 KB

The technical description for the installation of the Kõrveküla Primary School energy storage system includes detailed requirements and standards.

Töövõtulepingu projektDOC
Töövõtulepingu projekt.docx -- 48.9 KB

This draft works contract outlines the terms for the design and construction of an energy storage system for Kõrveküla Primary School, including contractor obligations and general contract conditions.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an energy storage system at Kõrveküla Primary School is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and has some minor practical limitations regarding document access.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The inclusion of 'or equivalent' clauses for standards and references enhances legal robustness.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements highlight specific areas like technical capability and financial considerations. The 'or equivalent' clauses are explicitly stated, contributing to clarity. The technical specifications document is marked as required, ensuring detailed information is available.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines. However, the 'Hankepass rahvusvahelises formaadis (ESPD) v2.0 laiendatud' is in an XML format not directly analyzable by AI, and the 'Töövõtulepingu projekt' and 'Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad' are marked as not required, which could be a point of concern for bidders seeking complete pre-tender information.

Some key documents (contract draft, evaluation criteria) are not marked as required.
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through the explicit 'or equivalent' clauses, ensuring a level playing field. The use of e-procurement and electronic submission is positive. The evaluation criteria are based on relative weighting, which is objective. The value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable.

Practicality65/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement. However, the contract duration of 4 months for design and construction might be tight depending on the complexity. The financing information is not explicitly detailed, and while the document URL is implied through the tender platform, it's not directly stated in the provided snippet.

Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
Contract duration of 4 months might be ambitious for design and construction.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While it is EU funded, this is a general characteristic rather than a specific sustainability initiative within the tender's requirements.

No explicit mention of green procurement criteria.
No explicit mention of social aspects or innovation.

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and requirements.
Use of e-procurement and electronic submission.
Inclusion of 'or equivalent' clauses for standards.
Objective evaluation criteria based on relative weighting.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation).
Some key documents not marked as required.
Limited detail on financing.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific green procurement or social responsibility criteria.
2. Mark all essential documents, such as the contract draft and evaluation criteria, as required.
3. Provide more detailed information regarding project financing.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline