Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login10 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
6 documents available with AI summaries
This document contains a technical drawing of an attic plan, detailing the removal and installation of roof hatches and grates, with associated measurements and symbols.
This document contains a detailed list of construction work volumes for the replacement of the roof structure of a multi-apartment residential building, including demolition, roofing, entrance canopy renovation, attic work, and debris removal.
This document outlines the tender requirements for the roof replacement of a multi-apartment building, including exclusion conditions, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.
This document contains the tender regulations and application forms for the replacement of a roof on a multi-apartment building in Madona, Latvia.
This document contains a construction cost estimate template for the replacement of a multi-apartment residential building's roofing.
This document contains the basic data for tender MN-MI-2026/01, which concerns the replacement of roof covering for a multi-apartment residential building in Madona.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for roof replacement is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks transparency in financial details and specific evaluation criteria. The process is largely compliant with open procurement principles.
The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope of work. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria, which could impact legal compliance if not detailed within the referenced documents.
The description of the works is clear, and essential documents like technical specifications and work volumes are referenced. Requirements are outlined in specific documents, contributing to clarity, although the absence of explicit evaluation criteria in the main notice is a minor drawback.
Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. Key documents are attached or referenced.
The tender is an open competition, and e-procurement is utilized, promoting fairness. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag suggests that not all documents might be fully accessible to all potential bidders without further action, which could be a fairness concern. The lack of disclosed evaluation criteria also impacts transparency.
The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Issues: No e-submission' flag contradicts the 'Procurement Characteristics: E-Procurement' field, creating ambiguity. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent.
Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The CPV code is provided.
There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender does not indicate if it is EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required