Skip to main content
Tenders

BCU-FTS-59576 Cellular Pathology Reagent Delivery and Collection

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
016830-2026
Value
£180,000
Location
Wales, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

September 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£180,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Wales
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (BCUHB) invites suppliers to tender for Cellular Pathology Reagent Delivery and Collection contract. The contract will be two (2) years with the option to extend for a further twelve (12) months.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the service is concise and understandable. However, the lack of specified eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements makes the overall clarity of what is expected from bidders moderate.

No specific eligibility requirements listed
No specific technical capability requirements listed
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. However, the absence of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria means the tender is not fully complete for bidders to prepare a comprehensive submission.

No specific requirements listed
No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and deadlines are provided. However, the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation and the absence of detailed requirements could lead to subjective assessments.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender provides a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the URL for tender documents limits its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on sustainability.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and deadline specified
CPV code included
Open procedure

Concerns

Lack of detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Missing evaluation criteria
No information on e-submission or document access
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria and their weighting.
3. Specify the method for document access and e-submission.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline