Grounds Maintenance – Coopers Edge

This tender for grounds maintenance is generally well-structured with clear service descriptions and essential financial information. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria, a clear indication of e-submission, and sustainability considerations.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for an open competition below the threshold. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no immediate flags for disputes. The deadlines, while perhaps tight, are stated. A missing reveal date is a minor issue.

The description of services required for grounds maintenance is clear and specific, detailing tasks such as grass cutting, hedge maintenance, and tree care, along with explicit prohibitions on herbicides. The requirements are well-documented within the description.

Key information such as estimated value, contract duration, and start date is present. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided. However, the lack of accessible tender documents with content limits the overall completeness assessment.

The tender is an open competition, indicating a good level of fairness. The estimated value is disclosed. While objective criteria are not explicitly stated, the requirements are described in a way that should allow for objective assessment if a clear evaluation methodology is applied internally. Full document access is hindered by the lack of content.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and a clear URL for document access reduces its practicality for potential bidders. The funding source is not specified.

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated and appear logically consistent. There are no stated disputes or suspensions. The dates provided for submission and start are within a reasonable sequence.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding. The prohibition on herbicides is a minor environmental control, but it does not represent a broader sustainability strategy for the tender.