Skip to main content
Tenders

Reconstruction of Krótka Street in Niedrzwica Duża

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00163597/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lubelskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Lubelskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction of Krótka Street in Niedrzwica Duża

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (11)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information in the text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS11
--Reconstruction of a single-lane, single-carriageway, one-way section of a municipal road, involving improvement of the road's technical parameters and unification with respect to the entire communication system in the given area, adaptation to traffic of vehicles with a permissible single driving axle load of up to 115 kN (11.5 t).
--Reconstruction of the road in terms of pedestrian communication routes.
--Construction and reconstruction of property accesses.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8603-c80e-ab15-056e-e500011b8aad.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for the reconstruction of Krótka Street in Niedrzwica Duża, Poland, with construction works being the subject of the tender.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road reconstruction in Niedrzwica Duża is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a proper CPV code. However, the estimated value is undisclosed, and evaluation criteria are missing, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and the missing reveal date are minor compliance concerns.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the road reconstruction works is detailed and specific, covering various aspects like road parameters, pedestrian routes, accesses, markings, fencing, and utility works. The technical requirements are clearly outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, CPV, and a submission deadline. However, the estimated value of the contract is not disclosed, and crucial details like contract duration and financing information are missing, reducing overall completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-procurement and the disclosure of a CPV code. The technical requirements are objective and not tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and missing evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for practicality. However, the absence of a specified contract start date and the lack of explicit financing information make it less practical for potential bidders to fully assess their capacity and resource allocation.

No e-submission (implied, as only e-procurement is mentioned)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, CPV code, and submission deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical within the context of a tender notice.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While some aspects like road reconstruction might indirectly contribute to sustainability, there are no specific criteria or targets set, resulting in a moderate score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear and detailed technical requirements
Proper CPV code provided
E-procurement utilized
Active status and available documents

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration and start date
Lack of explicit sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value for greater transparency.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria to guide bidders.
3. Include details on contract duration and start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline