Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction of centralized water supply and sewerage networks in Riga, Beberbeķu street 34 and Negais street 4 and 6

Open
Deadline
31 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
163068
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 22, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 22, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Tender Opening

April 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
9 months
Location
Riga
Type
Construction
70
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of centralized water supply and sewerage networks in Riga, Beberbeķu street 34 and Negais street 4 and 6

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender is an open tender with a submission deadline of April 27, 2026.
--Evaluation criteria are specified in Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija and Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion conditions are specified in Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija and Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Selection criteria are specified in Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija and Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Technical proposal requirements are specified in Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija and Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Financial proposal requirements are specified in Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija and Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
163068_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260322145355.pdf -- 103.1 KB

This document outlines the requirements for the first part of a tender concerning the construction of centralized water supply and sewage networks in Rīga, specifying exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
163068_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260322145356.pdf -- 103.1 KB

This document outlines the requirements for the second part of a tender concerning the construction of centralized water supply and sewage networks in Rīga, specifically for Beberbeķu iela 34 and Negaisa iela 4 and 6, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical, and financial proposal requirements.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender RŪ-2025/220, which is an open tender for the construction of centralized water supply and sewage networks in Riga, with a submission deadline of April 27, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for water and sewage network construction in Riga is generally well-structured but lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on sustainability. The value is undisclosed, impacting fairness and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement procedures. The CPV code is provided, and the procedure is open. However, the absence of clearly stated evaluation criteria could be a procedural deficiency.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and key requirements are referenced in specific documents. However, the evaluation criteria are not explicitly detailed within the provided information, which affects overall clarity.

Evaluation criteria not explicitly stated
Completeness70/100

Basic information like title, reference, organization, and deadline is present. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness65/100

The tender is an open procedure, and documents are referenced, which is positive. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the potential for restricted document access (as flagged) raise concerns about full transparency and fairness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Restricted document access (potential)
Practicality60/100

The tender utilizes an e-procurement system and specifies a contract start date implicitly through the timeline. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential hurdle, and financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission (flagged)
Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data integrity.

Sustainability25/100

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear project description
Open tender procedure
CPV code provided
Referenced technical specifications

Concerns

Undisclosed estimated value
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the tender.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria within the tender documentation.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into future tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline