Skip to main content
Tenders

Electric Vehicle Leasing - Salary Sacrifice

Open
Deadline
41 days left
May 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027221-2026
Value
£20,000,000
Location
West Midlands, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 07, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 31, 2026

Budget
£20,000,000
Duration
48 months
Location
West Midlands
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The provision of new and used leased electric vehicles to employees via Salary Sacrifice

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for electric vehicle leasing via salary sacrifice is generally well-structured, with clear financial and timeline information. However, a lack of detailed documentation and specified evaluation criteria presents areas for improvement.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a CPV code and specifying an open procedure. The deadlines, while potentially short, are stated. No disputes are reported. However, the lack of a reveal date for the full tender documentation could be a minor procedural issue.

Missing reveal date for tender documents.
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description clearly outline the service required: electric vehicle leasing for employees through salary sacrifice. AI-extracted requirements are listed, indicating the general categories of information sought from bidders. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which impacts clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness70/100

Key information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The submission deadline and contract start date are also provided. However, the absence of content for the tender documents means crucial details are missing.

No document content available.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and criteria such as eligibility and technical capability are mentioned, suggesting an objective approach. The absence of specific company tailoring is a positive. However, the lack of accessible full documentation until a reveal date and the unspecified evaluation criteria could pose challenges for some bidders.

Practicality65/100

The contract duration and start date are specified. Financing information is implied by the estimated value. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and no provided URL for documents hinders immediate practical engagement.

No e-submission specified.
No document URL provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are consistently populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logically ordered.

Sustainability50/100

The tender focuses on electric vehicles, which aligns with environmental goals. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement beyond the vehicle type, social aspects, or innovation drivers within the provided information.

Not green procurement (beyond EV).
No social criteria.

Strengths

Clear title and description of services.
Significant estimated value disclosed.
Open procedure for broad competition.
Logical timeline with contract duration and start date.

Concerns

Missing detailed tender documents.
Unspecified evaluation criteria.
Potential for short submission deadline.
Lack of explicit e-submission process.

Recommendations

1. Provide full tender documentation with clear reveal dates or immediate access.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness for bidders.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide necessary links.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline