Skip to main content
Tenders

ELISA analyzer with maintenance and goods

Open
Deadline
19 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
299870
Value
€1,300,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 13, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Price (total bid cost)100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Tender Opening

April 15, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,300,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€80,024
Avg. Bids
1.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
518 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The purpose of the procurement is to conclude a framework agreement for the acquisition of an ELISA analyzer (hereinafter referred to as the device), its accessories (hereinafter referred to as goods), and associated services (including repair, maintenance, and training).
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

22 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (11)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (5)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS11
--Bidders must submit compliance conditions.
--Bidders must confirm acceptance of the conditions.
--Bidders must submit cost and technical data.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific exclusion grounds mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must confirm they have reviewed and agree to the tender documents.
--Bidders must submit a signed application to participate in the tender procedure.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must submit a completed technical description and offer form.
--The technical description must include detailed information about the ELISA analyzer, its maintenance, and goods.
--This includes prices, technical specifications, maintenance costs, and proof of supplier representation.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit a completed cost form.
--The cost form must include the total cost of the device, services, goods, and maintenance.
--The total cost must be in accordance with the contracting authority's evaluation criteria.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
299870_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.5 KB

Bidders must submit compliance conditions, confirm acceptance of terms, provide cost and technical data, and complete required forms.

Kas ettevõtja kinnitab dokumendis "299870 Hankemenetluses osalemise avaldus" sät...DOC
299870 Hankemenetluses osalemise avaldus.docx -- 52.4 KB

The bidder must confirm they have reviewed the tender documents and agree to their terms by submitting a signed declaration of participation in the procurement procedure.

Pakkuja esitab täidetud maksumuse vormiXLS
299870 Maksumuse vorm.xlsx -- 39.3 KB

Bidders must submit a completed cost form detailing the total cost for equipment, services, goods, and maintenance according to the contracting authority's evaluation criteria.

Pakkuja esitab täidetud dokumendi "299870 Tehniline kirjeldus - pakkumusvorm"DOC
299870 Tehniline kirjeldus - pakkumusvorm.doc... -- 54.5 KB

Bidders must submit a completed technical specification and offer form detailing the ELISA analyzer, its maintenance, and goods, including pricing, technical specifications, maintenance costs, and proof of supplier representation.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
299870_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.3 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
299870_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 63.0 KB

The Procurement Pass is an initial self-declaration by the economic operator, containing the contracting authority's conditions and expected response format, but is not intended for completion itself.

Raamlepingu projektDOC
299870 Meditsiiniseadmete hoolduse ja kaub.do... -- 80.1 KB

This document is a draft framework agreement for the public procurement of Elisa analyzers, their maintenance, and goods, defining the rights and obligations of the buyer and seller during contract execution.

VerifitseerimisplaanDOC
299870 Verifitseerimisplaan.docx -- 35.5 KB

The contracting authority requires the supplier to submit a verification plan for the Elisa analyzer and associated reagents, which includes assessing the repeatability, trueness, and comparability of methods.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an Elisa analyzer and associated services is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and the practicality of submission could be enhanced.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard procurement regulations. The CPV code is provided, and the procedure is clear. Deadlines are reasonable within the context of a public tender. No immediate legal compliance issues are flagged.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, detailing the need for an Elisa analyzer, its supplies, and maintenance services. The technical requirements, including the verification plan and submission forms, are documented. Evaluation criteria are specified.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information such as estimated value, duration, and deadlines are present. The purpose of the tender is well-defined. However, the financial value is presented as 'Estimated Value' and then later as a 'maximum maksumus', which could cause minor confusion. Not all documents have detailed summaries provided for AI analysis, impacting a complete completeness score.

Conflicting financial value reporting (Estimated vs. Maximum)
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to all interested parties, and the evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. The maximum number of participants is set to 1, which is unusual and potentially restrictive, but this is explained as ensuring a functional whole. Full document access is implied through the e-procurement platform. The exclusion of splitting into lots is justified.

Maximum participants set to 1
Practicality65/100

The tender mandates electronic submission, which is positive. However, the AI analysis could not access the content of all attached documents, particularly the XML ESPD, which may indicate potential user interface challenges for bidders or the AI. The presence of a framework agreement draft is good, but the financing information is minimal.

Limited AI analysis of all document types
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical and sequential for a tender process.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation. While it mentions efficient use of funds, this is focused on cost rather than broader sustainability. The funding source is not specified as EU funded.

No explicit mention of green or social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical requirements and evaluation criteria
Mandatory electronic submission
Well-defined procurement objective and duration

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Unusual 'Max Participants: 1' setting, although explained
Potential for minor confusion regarding financial value reporting

Recommendations

1. Consider integrating explicit sustainability or innovation criteria.
2. Clarify the distinction between 'Estimated Value' and 'Maximum Maksumus' to avoid ambiguity.
3. Ensure all document types are fully accessible for analysis by tenderers and systems.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline