Skip to main content
Tenders

Electronic Presentation of Evidence - Court Equipment and Presentation Packages PR 2025 083

Open
Deadline
23 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
018345-2026
Value
£5,800,154
Location
Inner London - West, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 02, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 01, 2027

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£5,800,154
Duration
24 months
Location
Inner London - West
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

This notice is not a call for competition. Its purpose is to make the market aware of this opportunity, which currently has an indicative publication date of w/c 23/03/26 (or throughout that week). Lot One: Court Equipment The Contract (Framework Agreement) will be for a two-year duration. The estimated whole life contract value is £3,817,997.85 ex-VAT /£4,581,597.42 inc-VAT. The service requires the temporary installation of a range of audio, video, and tablet hardware to facilitate the electronic presentation of evidence in a Court (or alternative) setting over the course of a trial. In addition to this hardware, Technician support will be required for; a) equipment installation and removal, b) user training, c) onsite support. This lot shall be divided into three geographical zones covering England and Wales, and no single tenderer may hold the primary role (i.e., first-ranked position) in more than one zone. Potential zones by CPS Areas: Zone 1 Cymru/Wales Mersey-Cheshire North East North West Yorkshire and Humberside Zone 2 East Midlands East of England West Midlands Zones 3 London North & South* South East South West Thames and Chiltern Wessex Existing spend and utilisation data for Court Equipment services is partially corrupted, meaning that accurate projections for specific equipment types and zone level spend data cannot be detailed. To help Tenderers prepare their bids the following historic trend information is provided: a) approximately 10% of Court Equipment enabled cases required a tablet. b) approximately 15% of Court Equipment enabled cases required an operator. c) approximately 81% of Court Equipment enabled cases required one or more large screens. d) approximately 89% of Court Equipment enabled cases required had one or more speakers. e) approximately 90% of Court Equipment enabled cases utilised one or more laptops. f) approximately 97% of Court Equipment enabled cases utilised standard screens. Lot Two: Presentation Packages The Contract (Framework Agreement) will be for a two-year duration. The estimated whole life contract value inclusive of all options is £1,015,463.83 ex-VAT/ £1,218,556.60 inc-VAT. The service requires the transformation of various forms of evidence (e.g. photographs, CCTV, audio files, technical drawings etc) into a digital format that is easily understandable, and can be presented in a Court (or alternative) setting, including but not limited to; a) creation of chronological timelines to link related documents and other Source Materials b) forensic injury mapping – including interpretation of pathologist reports c) closed circuit television and video enhancement d) audio enhancement e) voice distortion Technician support may be required for; a) supplying the relevant presentation package to the Court b) conducting a test of the presentation on the display equipment available in the Court c) operation of the package throughout the course of the hearing This lot shall operate on a national basis, across England and Wales. Existing spend and utilisation data for Presentation Packages services is partially corrupted, meaning that accurate demand forecasts cannot be provided. To help tenderers prepare their bids the following historic trend information is provided: a) approximately 36% of Presentation Packages required graphics with 5 or less external injuries. b) approximately 65% of Presentation Packages required graphics with 6-12 external injuries. c) approximately 97% of Presentation Packages required graphics depicting internal injuries. d) approximately 97% of Presentation Packages required project management support from the supplier.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

39 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (25)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--The tender is an open type.
--The notice is not a call for competition and is for market awareness.
--Indicative publication date is w/c 23/03/26.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Tenderers must be aware of this opportunity, which has an indicative publication date of w/c 23/03/26.
--For Lot One, no single tenderer may hold the primary role (first-ranked position) in more than one geographical zone.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS25
--Lot One: Court Equipment
--Ability to provide temporary installation of audio, video, and tablet hardware for electronic evidence presentation.
--Provision of technician support for equipment installation and removal.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Lot One: Estimated whole life contract value is £3,817,997.85 ex-VAT / £4,581,597.42 inc-VAT.
--Lot Two: Estimated whole life contract value inclusive of all options is £1,015,463.83 ex-VAT/ £1,218,556.60 inc-VAT.
--Total estimated value across both lots is approximately £4,833,461.68 ex-VAT.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This planned tender for electronic presentation of evidence in courts offers detailed technical and financial information but lacks explicit evaluation criteria and information on how to access tender documents.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and has a proper CPV code. While deadlines are present, the indication that it's 'not a call for competition' and has an 'indicative publication date' can create ambiguity. However, the structure suggests compliance with standard procurement practices.

Clarity80/100

The description of services for both lots is reasonably clear, detailing the requirements for court equipment and presentation packages. Historic trend data is provided to assist tenderers. However, the absence of specific evaluation criteria is a significant lack of clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated values, contract duration, and start dates. However, the crucial aspect of how to access the full tender documentation is missing, significantly impacting completeness.

No document content available.
Fairness85/100

The division of Lot One into geographical zones, with a restriction on holding the primary role in more than one zone, promotes competition and fairness among bidders. The values are disclosed. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could otherwise impact fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender indicates it's a 'planned' status and 'not a call for competition,' suggesting it's in a pre-procurement phase. The absence of details on e-submission mechanisms or direct URLs to tender documents reduces practicality. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond estimated contract values.

No e-submission.
Document URL missing.
Data Consistency90/100

Key financial fields, dates, and classification codes (CPV, NUTS) are populated. The tender status is 'planned' with no indication of suspension or disputes, and the dates provided are logical within the context of a planned tender.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This indicates a standard procurement approach without specific sustainability mandates.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria.

Strengths

Detailed description of services for two distinct lots.
Division of Lot One into geographical zones enhances fairness.
Provision of historic trend data for bidder preparation.
Clear CPV and NUTS codes provided.

Concerns

Missing critical information on how to access tender documents.
Absence of specified evaluation criteria.
Unclear if the 'indicative publication date' is the actual tender release date.
Lack of explicit details on e-submission procedures.

Recommendations

1. Provide clear instructions and links for accessing full tender documentation.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria that will be used to assess bids.
3. Clarify the official tender publication date and the transition from 'planned' status to 'call for competition'.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline