Skip to main content
Tenders

Windsor Forest Colleges Group - M&E Tender

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
020716-2026
Value
£1,272,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£1,272,000
Duration
36 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Provision of M&E Services to the Windsor Forest Colleges Group

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender offers a moderate level of quality with a clear description and sufficient basic information. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable given the estimated value. No disputes are reported. The primary concern is the lack of explicit mention of regulatory compliance beyond standard procurement procedures.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the CPV code is appropriate. However, the absence of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements, as well as missing evaluation criteria, significantly reduces clarity on how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the lack of detailed requirements and attached document content prevents a full assessment of completeness. The submission deadline is provided.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and deadlines are provided. The lack of specific tailored requirements indicates a good level of fairness. However, the absence of e-submission and clear evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair.

Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are specified. However, the absence of e-submission, a clear document URL for accessing full details, and explicit financing information limits practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
Document URL not explicitly provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the timeline appears consistent. The tender status is active.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding, which are common in modern tenders. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Specified estimated value and contract duration
Open procedure for fairness
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
No evaluation criteria specified
Lack of e-submission
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Clearly define evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects and consider e-submission for improved practicality.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline