Skip to main content
Tenders

Environmentally friendly cleaning services for premises and adjacent territory

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
168375
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 16, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Selection criteriaOther
Financial evaluation methodsPrice
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Riga
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€336,807
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
3,844 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Environmentally friendly cleaning services for premises and adjacent territory

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Basic data for procurement LRST 2026/4, which is for environmentally friendly cleaning services for premises and adjacent territory, with a submission deadline of March 31, 2026.
--The tender requirements for environmentally friendly cleaning services for premises and adjacent areas include selection criteria and financial evaluation methods.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tender requirements for environmentally friendly cleaning services for premises and adjacent areas include selection criteria and financial evaluation methods.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tender requirements for environmentally friendly cleaning services for premises and adjacent areas include selection criteria and financial evaluation methods.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--This document contains the technical specification for environmentally friendly cleaning services for the premises and adjacent territory of the Constitutional Court of Latvia.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The tender requirements for environmentally friendly cleaning services for premises and adjacent areas include selection criteria and financial evaluation methods.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168375_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260316154205.pdf -- 99.6 KB

This document contains the tender requirements for environmentally friendly cleaning services for premises and adjacent areas, including selection criteria and financial evaluation methods.

NolikumsDOC
1. Pielikums_LRST_2026_4_(Tehniska_specifikac... -- 51.7 KB

This document contains the technical specification for environmentally friendly cleaning services for the premises and adjacent territory of the Constitutional Court of Latvia.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for procurement LRST 2026/4, which is for environmentally friendly cleaning services for premises and adjacent territory, with a submission deadline of March 31, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for environmentally friendly cleaning services is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the undisclosed estimated value and lack of specified evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines are reasonable. No disputes are reported. The primary concern is the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria, which could impact legal defensibility if challenged.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly indicate the service required. The attached documents provide technical specifications and tender requirements. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, reference, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the use of e-procurement is noted. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag raises concerns about full document access for all potential bidders. The lack of disclosed evaluation criteria also impacts fairness.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential issue with the submission process itself, which is a critical aspect of practicality. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, only the duration.

No e-submission (flagged in checks, but e-procurement characteristic is present - potential contradiction or nuance)
Contract start date not explicitly specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logical within the context of the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The title explicitly mentions 'environmentally friendly' services, suggesting a focus on green procurement. However, there is no explicit mention of social aspects or innovation within the provided information, and it is not indicated as EU funded.

No explicit social criteria mentioned
No explicit innovation focus mentioned

Strengths

Clear title and description
Open procedure with e-procurement characteristic
Reasonable submission deadline
CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access (potential issue)
Potential ambiguity in e-submission process

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Clarify the document access policy and ensure full access for all registered bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline