Skip to main content
Tenders

Türi Storage Site reconstruction

Open
Deadline
28 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
298769
Value
€500,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 06, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
lowest price under given conditions100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Tender Opening

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€500,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€524,963
Avg. Bids
4.7
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
94%
5,932 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Work in the tender: Reconstruction of the Türi railway freight storage and loading site, lighting, noise barriers, fences. Procurement of materials is the contractor's responsibility.
Electronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (7)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--The bid price must be submitted according to the structure specified by the contracting authority.
--Bidders must submit a detailed cost table including overheads and site preparation costs.
--Bidders must adhere to safety requirements for working in the railway safety zone.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not have grounds for exclusion.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must provide a Hankepass (ESPD) as initial evidence.
--If bidding as a joint offer, a power of attorney for representing joint bidders is required.
--A power of attorney for the bidder's representative is required.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit a reference contract form with at least two similar work contracts completed in the previous three years, confirming their proper fulfillment.
--Bidders may rely on a subcontractor's professional or technical competence, confirmed by a consent form.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit net turnover data for the last three financial years (2023-2025) for road construction and electrical works.
--Bidders may rely on a third party's economic and financial standing, confirmed by a consent form.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

15 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
298769_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 3.9 KB

The tender document "Compliance Conditions" clarifies requirements for joint bidder power of attorney, submission conditions including safety requirements for working in railway safety zones, and mandates the submission of the bid price according to the structure specified by the contracting authority.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
298769_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, where the lowest price under the given conditions receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
298769_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 42.8 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes the contracting authority's stipulated conditions and expected response formats.

HD Lisa 0. EDR konf hankelDOC
HD Lisa 0 EDR konf hankel.docx -- 15.1 KB

Bidders must confirm adherence to confidentiality requirements regarding non-public data provided by the contracting authority.

HD Lisa 1. Tehniline KirjeldusPDF
HD Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf -- 229.3 KB

Contracting Authority Edelaraudtee AS is seeking a contractor for the reconstruction of the Türi logistics site, involving road construction, external lighting and communication network installation, and the relocation or protection of existing utility networks.

HD Lisa 2.1. Lepingu projektDOC
HD Lisa 21 Leping (projekt).docx -- 43.5 KB

This document is the draft construction contract for the reconstruction of the Türi logistics yard, outlining the scope of work, cost, and terms of execution, forming an integral part of the agreement.

HD Lisa 2.2. Lepingu konfidentsiaalsuskinnitusDOC
HD Lisa 22 Lepingu konfidentsiaalsuslisa.docx -- 23.8 KB

This confidentiality addendum regulates the non-disclosure of sensitive information related to the Türi warehouse area reconstruction contract.

HD Lisa 3. Avaldus-kinnituskiriDOC
HD lisa 3 Avaldus-kinnituskiri.docx -- 22.3 KB

This declaration-confirmation letter confirms that the bidder has reviewed the tender documents, meets the requirements, possesses the necessary resources for contract execution, and has no grounds for exclusion, also specifying subcontracting plans.

HD Lisa 4-1. Pakkuja esindaja volikiriDOC
HD Lisa 4-1 Pakkuja esindaja volikiri.docx -- 14.7 KB

This power of attorney is required to authorize an individual to represent bidders in the Edelaraudtee AS Türi warehouse area reconstruction tender.

HD Lisa 4.2. Volikiri ühispakkujate esindamiseksDOC
HD Lisa 4-2 Volikiri ühispakkujate esindamise... -- 15.7 KB

This power of attorney is required to represent joint bidders and to perform actions related to the procurement procedure, contract signing, and execution on their behalf.

HD Lisa 5.1. Nõusolek majanduslikule või finantsseisundile tuginemiseksDOC
HD Lisa 5-1 Nõusolek majanduslikule või finan... -- 17.2 KB

This document is a consent form allowing the bidder to rely on a third party's economic and financial standing to prove tender qualification.

HD Lisa 5-2. Nõusolek kutsealasele või tehnilisele pädevusele tuginemiseksDOC
HD Lisa 5-2 Nõusolek kutsealasele või tehnili... -- 17.2 KB

This document is a consent form where the bidder confirms reliance on a subcontractor's professional or technical competence for the Türi warehouse site reconstruction tender.

HD Lisa 6. Sarnaste tööde netokäiveDOC
HD Lisa 6 Sarnaste tööde netokäive.docx -- 16.3 KB

The bidder must submit their net turnover data for the last three financial years (2023-2025) in road construction and electrical works to prove compliance with the financial requirements set by the contracting authority.

HD Lisa 7. ReferentslepingudDOC
HD Lisa 7 Referentslepingud.docx -- 17.6 KB

The bidder must submit a reference contract form listing at least two similar works contracts completed in the previous three years, confirming their proper execution.

HD Lisa 8. Maksumuse TabelXLS
HD Lisa 8 Maksumuse Tabel.xlsx -- 25.9 KB

Bidders must submit a detailed cost table including general expenses and site preparation costs for the Türi warehouse area reconstruction tender.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the reconstruction of the Türi logistics site is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on standard documentation.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. The procedure is an open tender (Type E, Procedure LM), which is a standard compliant format.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, outlining the scope of reconstruction, lighting, noise barriers, and fences. Requirements are documented through various attached documents. The evaluation criterion is clearly specified as the lowest bid price.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and contract start date. However, the financing condition is referred to 'vt lepingu projekt' which could be more explicit. The number of attached documents is substantial, indicating a good level of detail.

Financing condition reference could be more direct.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. The evaluation criterion is objective (lowest price). E-submission and e-procurement are mandated, promoting fairness. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are utilized. A contract start date is provided. However, the financing condition is vague ('vt lepingu projekt'), and while the duration is specified as 'PERIOD' and tender validity is 4 months, the actual contract duration is not explicitly stated beyond the start date.

Actual contract duration is not explicitly stated.
Financing condition is vague.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates are logically sequenced (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date, Contract Start).

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, which often implies sustainability requirements. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
No mention of social aspects or innovation.

Strengths

Clear and objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Comprehensive set of required documentation for qualification.
Well-defined scope of works.

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.
Vague financing condition reference.
Actual contract duration not explicitly stated.

Recommendations

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility).
2. Clarify the financing condition and explicitly state the contract duration.
3. Consider adding innovation as an evaluation factor if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline