Skip to main content
Tenders

Pre-Market Engagement Notice for Modular Buildings Framework

Open
Deadline
34 days left
May 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
023938-2026
Value
£1,200,000,000
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 01, 2026

Contract Start Date

September 27, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£1,200,000,000
Duration
48 months
Location
North East England
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Established in 2004, Procurement for Housing (PfH) is a national procurement consortium dedicated to the social housing sector and supported by the National Housing Federation (NHF), Chartered Institute of Housing (CIH) and HouseMark. Collectively our Members manage more than 90% of UK’ social housing stock, with PfH helping them to achieve efficiency savings using a wide range of services including framework agreements, dynamic purchasing systems, spend analyses, strategy reviews, consolidated billing and comprehensive reporting. PfH is a contracting authority under section 2 of the Procurement Act 2023 and a centralised procurement authority under section 1(4) of that Act. Please refer to www.pfh.co.uk for additional information. PfH is administered by Inprova Limited and is headquartered in the North West of England with over 20 years of expertise and experience offering a complete procurement solutions package across outsourcing, technology and consultancy. By integrating procurement services and technology, Inprova operates as a delivery partner, supporting business performance improvement for the public sector. PfH intends to establish a framework agreement for Modular Buildings and Associated Services such as consultancy. The framework will operate nationally for four years.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific submission requirements provided in the tender document]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific mandatory exclusion grounds provided in the tender document]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific eligibility requirements provided in the tender document]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific technical capability requirements provided in the tender document]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific financial requirements provided in the tender document]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This is a pre-market engagement notice for a modular buildings framework. While it provides essential information and a clear objective, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, and the deadline may be tight.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The notice correctly identifies the organization as a contracting authority and mentions relevant legislation. The CPV code is appropriate. However, the absence of a reveal date and specified evaluation criteria could pose challenges for legal compliance in the subsequent stages of procurement.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the organization and its purpose is clear. The intention to establish a framework for modular buildings and associated services is well-articulated. However, the lack of specific details regarding submission and technical requirements reduces overall clarity.

No specific submission requirements provided
No specific technical capability requirements provided
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration is present. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided. However, crucial details like mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are missing, impacting completeness.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing eligibility requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is structured as a framework agreement, which generally promotes competition. The value is disclosed, and the organization is a public body. However, the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation and the absence of details on submission requirements could potentially lead to less transparent processes if not addressed in subsequent documentation.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The notice provides a contract start date and duration. However, it does not specify an e-submission method, and the URL for additional information is provided, but no direct document URLs are listed. The absence of financing information is also noted.

No e-submission specified
No financing information provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a planning notice.

Sustainability50/100

The notice does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the assessment of sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and its role well-defined
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Appropriate CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing critical requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
No evaluation criteria specified
Potential deadline tightness
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation elements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline