Skip to main content
Tenders

Gravimetric control workstation with software for chemotherapy preparations

Open
Deadline
25 days left
April 21, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
168651
Value
€50,000
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 14, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 21, 2026

Tender Opening

April 21, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€50,000
Duration
12 months
Location
Riga
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€36,535
Avg. Bids
2.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
23,680 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Gravimetric control workstation with software for chemotherapy preparations
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--All tender documents must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-21T10:00:00.
--The tender must be submitted in accordance with the regulations outlined in the 'Nolikums' document.
--Requirements for the technical and financial proposal are detailed in the 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' document.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The bidder must not be subject to any of the mandatory exclusion grounds as stipulated in the tender documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must be legally registered and authorized to conduct business in their country of origin.
--The bidder must possess the necessary permits and licenses to supply the specified equipment.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The gravimetric control workstation must meet the specifications detailed in the 'Tehniskā specifikācija - Finanšu piedāvājums' document.
--The workstation must be equipped with appropriate software for chemotherapy preparation.
--The bidder must demonstrate experience in supplying similar equipment.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The financial offer must be submitted in the format provided in the 'Tehniskā specifikācija - Finanšu piedāvājums' document.
--Pricing must be detailed and inclusive of all costs.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168651_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260319100006.pdf -- 102.7 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning a gravimetric control workstation for chemotherapy preparations, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_2026_61_AF.docx -- 117.2 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender for a gravimetric control workstation for chemotherapy preparations with software, issued by the Paula Stradins Clinical University Hospital.

Tehniskā specifikācija - Finanšu piedāvājumsXLS
Tehniskais - finanšu piedāvājums_1.xlsx -- 12.6 KB

This document contains a technical specification and a financial offer form for a gravimetric control workstation for chemotherapy preparation, detailing its functions and pricing.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for a gravimetric control workstation with software for chemotherapy preparation, including identification numbers, deadlines, and contact information.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a gravimetric control workstation is generally well-structured with clear requirements and financial information. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has potential issues with document access, impacting overall fairness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of an open procedure. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required workstation is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected. Key documents are identified, contributing to clarity. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, estimated value, and contract duration. Four tender documents are listed, suggesting a comprehensive set of information. However, the 'restricted document access' flag indicates potential incompleteness for bidders.

Restricted document access
Fairness85/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and uses an e-procurement system, which promotes fairness. The requirements are generally objective. However, the 'restricted document access' is a significant concern for equal access to information, potentially impacting fairness.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting e-submission is likely. Financing information is implied through the estimated value. However, the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks contradicts this, creating confusion. The contract duration is specified.

Potential contradiction regarding e-submission
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided details, leading to a moderate score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of the required workstation
Well-defined financial and timeline information
Use of e-procurement system
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access
Ambiguity regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Clarify evaluation criteria to ensure transparency.
2. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.
3. Confirm and clearly state the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline