Skip to main content
Tenders

Furniture supply for Riga State Gymnasium No. 3

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
167826
Value
€124,000
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 16, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Technical OfferTechnical
Financial OfferPrice
Bidder's ExperienceExperience
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€124,000
Duration
2 months
Location
Riga
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€31,439
Avg. Bids
2.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
4,396 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Furniture supply for Riga State Gymnasium No. 3

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (6)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (7)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--Proposals must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-02T09:00:00.
--The tender is an open competition procurement.
--Bidders must comply with the regulations for the open tender (NOLIKUMS RV3G 2026_1).
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to exclusion grounds as outlined in the "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" document.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Bidders must submit an application form (1.pielikums_Pieteikums).
--Bidders must confirm the truthfulness of submitted information and agreement with tender terms.
--Bidders must provide a declaration confirming an independently prepared bid (2.pielikums_Apliecinājums).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must adhere to the technical specification for 2026 (3.pielikums_Tehniskā specifikācija).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified in the provided documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167826_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260316171704.pdf -- 98.4 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the supply of furniture to Riga State 3rd Gymnasium, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

1.pielikums_PieteikumsDOC
RV3G_2026_1_1.pielikums_pieteikums_1.docx -- 18.1 KB

This document is an application form for an open tender for the supply of furniture to Riga State Gymnasium No. 3, requiring bidders to confirm the truthfulness of their submitted information and their agreement with the tender terms.

2.pielikums_ApliecinājumsDOC
RV3G_2026_1_2.pielikums_apliecinajums_1.docx -- 18.7 KB

This document contains a bidder's declaration confirming an independently prepared bid for the furniture supply tender at Riga State 3rd Gymnasium.

3.pielikums_Tehniskā specifikācijaXLS
RV3G_2026_1_3.pielikums_TS_piedāvājums_1.xlsx -- 2.9 MB

This document contains the technical specification for 2026, which is part of the technical and financial offer.

4.pielikums_Pretendenta pieredzeDOC
RV3G_2026_1_4.pielikums_pieredze_1.docx -- 16.3 KB

This document requires bidders to provide information about their experience in delivering and installing furniture for educational institutions over the past three years, along with supporting documentation.

5.pielikums_ApakšuzņēmējiDOC
RV3G_2026_1_5.pielikums_apaksuznemeji_1.docx -- 16.2 KB

This document contains a list of subcontractors or persons whose capabilities the bidder relies on for the open tender for furniture supply to Riga State 3rd Gymnasium.

6.pielikums_Apakšuzņēmēju apliecinājumsDOC
RV3G_2026_1_6.pielikums_apaksuzn_apliecinajum... -- 17.2 KB

This document contains a subcontractor's confirmation of their readiness to participate in the contract execution for the supply of furniture to Riga State 3rd Gymnasium.

7.pielikums_Līguma projektsDOC
RV3G_2026_1_7.pielikums_liguma projekts.doc -- 76.0 KB

This document contains the draft supply contract for furniture for Rīgas Valsts ģimnāzija, outlining the subject matter, payment terms, warranty, and dispute resolution.

8.pielikums_Objekta apskates lapaDOC
RV3G_2026_1_8_pielikums_objekta.apskates.lapa... -- 33.0 KB

This document is a site inspection form for a tender, requiring the bidder's representative to confirm their review of the object and technical specifications.

NOLIKUMS RV3G 2026_1DOC
RV3G 2026_1_NOLIKUMS.docx -- 63.7 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender for the supply of furniture to Riga State 3rd Gymnasium, identifying the procurement number, contracting authority, bidder requirements, and submission procedures.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains basic data for an open competition procurement for the delivery of furniture to Rīgas Valsts 3.ģimnāzija, with a deadline for proposal submission on April 2, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for furniture supply to Riga State 3rd Gymnasium is generally well-structured with clear documentation and requirements. Key concerns include the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and potential document access restrictions, impacting fairness and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear open competition format and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the structure.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, and the requirements are documented through various attached forms and specifications. The conditions for participation and contract execution are outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the absence of explicit financial requirements for bidders and the lack of specified evaluation criteria detract from overall completeness.

Missing explicit financial requirements for bidders.
Evaluation criteria are not explicitly detailed in the provided summary.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, and the value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag suggests potential fairness concerns if not all bidders have equal access to necessary information.

Potential restricted document access.
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. The duration is specified as 2 months.

Contract start date not explicitly specified.
Financing information is absent.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and value are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes, and the dates appear logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement requirements.
No social criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear open competition procedure.
Comprehensive set of required documents (forms, specs, contract draft).
E-procurement utilized.
Reasonable deadlines and disclosed value.

Concerns

Lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria.
Potential for restricted document access.
Absence of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
2. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline