Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Reconstruction of municipal roads: Czerwonego Krzyża street (102373L), Staropijarska street (102492L), Kościelna street (102413L) in the town of Łuków

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00166492/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lubelskie, Poland
Published
March 28, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Lubelskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction of municipal roads: Czerwonego Krzyża street (102373L), Staropijarska street (102492L), Kościelna street (102413L) in the town of Łuków

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for municipal road reconstruction in Łuków presents a straightforward opportunity for experienced civil engineering firms. The primary evaluation criterion appears to be price, with limited emphasis on qualitative factors. Success hinges on a competitive price, meticulous adherence to submission requirements, and demonstrating robust technical capability, even if not explicitly detailed in the provided snippets.

Key Winning Messages

Delivering high-quality road reconstruction on time and within budget.

Proven expertise in municipal infrastructure projects.

Commitment to efficient and reliable execution.

Key Opportunities
The absence of specified technical capability, financial, or eligibility requirements in the provided snippets suggests a potential for less stringent pre-qualification, allowing a wider range of bidders. However, this also means the contracting authority may have these requirements in the full SWZ (Specification of the Contract Award Procedure).
The tender explicitly mentions 'Cena' (Price) as an evaluation criterion, indicating that a competitive price will be a significant factor in winning.
The tender is for municipal road reconstruction, a common type of project where established contractors can leverage existing experience and supply chains for cost efficiencies.
Key Challenges
Lack of detailed evaluation criteria beyond price. The 'Kryterium jakościowe - inne' (Qualitative criterion - other) with 'Termin gwarancji' (Warranty period) is mentioned but without weighting or specific requirements.

Thoroughly review the full SWZ document for any unextracted qualitative criteria. If warranty period is the only qualitative factor, offer a competitive warranty period that is sustainable for the business and aligns with industry best practices, without over-promising.

The absence of explicit requirements for 'Green Procurement' or 'Social Aspects' in the tender summary might lead bidders to overlook these areas, potentially missing an opportunity to differentiate if the full SWZ does contain subtle expectations or if the contracting authority has unstated preferences.

While not explicitly required, consider incorporating sustainable practices (e.g., waste reduction, efficient material use) and local employment commitments into the bid where feasible and cost-effective. This can be framed as good practice and operational efficiency.

The submission deadline is in the distant future (2026-04-10), which can lead to complacency or a lack of focus from potential bidders. This also means the tender documents could be updated or amended.

Mark this tender in your pipeline for regular review. Assign responsibility for monitoring any amendments or clarifications issued by the contracting authority. Begin preliminary planning and resource allocation well in advance to ensure a well-prepared bid closer to the deadline.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced civil engineering contractor with a proven track record in municipal road construction and reconstruction projects in Poland. The ideal bidder will have strong financial standing, efficient project management capabilities, and a competitive cost structure. Familiarity with Polish public procurement law and local regulations is essential.
Key Requirements
Submission of all required documents and declarations in the correct format and by the deadline.
Demonstration of capability to execute road reconstruction works (implied by tender type).
Competitive pricing.
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds (as per Polish Public Procurement Law).
Accurate completion of the offer form, including identification of the contractor and any subcontractors.
Submission of the 'Załącznik nr 6 do SWZ oświadczenie roboty.docx' if bidding as a consortium.
Submission of the 'Załącznik nr 10 do SWZ oświadczenie o aktualności.docx' upon request.
Key Discriminators
A highly competitive price that demonstrates cost-efficiency and value for money.
A clear and concise offer that meticulously addresses all (known and anticipated) requirements.
Demonstrating a strong understanding of local context and potential challenges in Łuków.
Offering a warranty period that exceeds the minimum expectation (if specified) without significantly impacting cost.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to employing local labor from the Łuków region for a specified percentage of the workforce, contributing to the local economy and community development. (Even if not explicitly requested, this can be a subtle differentiator).
Bid Focus Areas
PriceHigh (implied)

Develop a cost-effective bid by optimizing resource allocation, material sourcing, and project management. Conduct thorough cost analysis to ensure competitiveness while maintaining profitability. Benchmark against similar projects if possible.

Warranty Period (Qualitative)Medium (implied)

Offer a warranty period that is competitive and sustainable. If the full SWZ provides specific requirements or weighting, tailor the offer accordingly. Ensure the proposed warranty is supported by the company's operational capacity and quality control processes.

Recommendations6
Obtain and thoroughly review the full SWZ document.
CriticalMed effort

The provided snippets are incomplete. It is imperative to obtain the complete Specification of the Contract Award Procedure (SWZ) to understand all mandatory requirements, eligibility criteria, technical capabilities, financial standing, detailed evaluation criteria (including weighting), and any specific clauses related to social value or sustainability that may not have been flagged.

Ensures full compliance and identifies all critical success factors.
Develop a highly competitive pricing strategy.
CriticalHigh effort

Given that 'Price' is explicitly listed as an evaluation criterion, a competitive price is paramount. Conduct a detailed cost breakdown, considering all direct and indirect costs, overheads, and a reasonable profit margin. Explore opportunities for cost savings through efficient planning, material procurement, and subcontractor selection.

Significantly increases the likelihood of winning the tender.
Prepare a clear and concise offer, meticulously addressing all requirements.
HighMed effort

A well-organized and easy-to-understand bid demonstrates professionalism and attention to detail. Ensure all sections are completed accurately, all requested documents are attached, and the language is clear and professional. Highlight relevant past experience and capabilities.

Reduces the risk of disqualification due to administrative errors and leaves a positive impression on the evaluator.
Clarify any ambiguities with the Contracting Authority.
HighLow effort

If, after reviewing the full SWZ, any requirements or evaluation criteria remain unclear, proactively submit clarification requests to the Contracting Authority well before the deadline. This demonstrates engagement and ensures a correct understanding of expectations.

Prevents misinterpretations and ensures the bid meets the authority's expectations.
Monitor for tender amendments and updates.
MediumLow effort

Given the long submission deadline, the tender documents may be updated or amended. Regularly check the relevant procurement portal for any new information, clarifications, or modifications issued by Miasto Łuków. Ensure your bid is based on the latest version of the tender documents.

Prevents bidding on outdated or incorrect tender requirements.
Consider incorporating subtle social value commitments.
LowLow effort

Although not explicitly required, consider how to subtly integrate elements of social value, such as local employment or sustainable material sourcing, into the bid proposal. This can be framed as operational efficiency or community engagement, potentially adding value without significant cost increases.

May provide a slight edge if the contracting authority has unstated preferences or for future tenders.
Competitive Positioning
Focus on demonstrating superior value for money through a combination of competitive pricing and efficient, high-quality execution. Highlight past project successes in similar road reconstruction works, emphasizing timely delivery and adherence to budget. If the full SWZ reveals any qualitative aspects, ensure these are addressed with concrete examples and evidence of capability.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de88c7-048c-30fb-056e-e50001aa9981.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the reconstruction of municipal roads in Łuków, Poland, detailing the contracting authority and communication procedures.

Specyfikacja Warunków Zamówienia.pdfPDF
Specyfikacja Warunków Zamówienia.pdf

This document contains the Specification of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for the reconstruction of municipal roads in Łuków, detailing the scope of works, tender procedure, and bidder requirements.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for municipal road reconstruction in Łuków is generally well-structured with available documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and financial details, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear CPV code and active status. However, the absence of specific evaluation criteria and potential for a short submission deadline (depending on actual document review) are minor concerns.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and the availability of 13 documents, including the Specification of Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ), suggests a good level of detail. However, the lack of explicit eligibility, technical, and financial requirements in the AI-extracted section indicates these might be buried within the documents.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and CPV code. The estimated value is not disclosed, and contract duration is missing, which affects the completeness of the financial and timeline information.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is marked as E-Procurement, promoting accessibility. All documents are available, and the value is disclosed (though not the specific amount). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair process.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes E-Procurement, which is positive. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and financing details are only broadly mentioned as external funding. The contract start date is also missing, impacting the overall practicality for potential bidders.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, and CPV code are populated. The tender is active with no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical within the context of a tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions funding from the 'Rządowy Fundusz Rozwoju Dróg' (Government Road Development Fund), which may imply certain standards, but there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided text.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Active E-Procurement process
Comprehensive set of attached documents
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration and start date
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria within the tender documents.
3. Incorporate specific sustainability or social value objectives if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline