Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Assessors for King's Awards 2026-2029

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
022721-2026
Value
£1,524,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 21, 2026

Budget
£1,524,000
Duration
35 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) is launching a procurement for the provision of Assessors for the King’s Awards for Enterprise. This ITT formally invites suppliers to submit bids to deliver assessment services in support of the King’s Awards for Enterprise programme. DBT is seeking suitably qualified suppliers capable of providing robust, impartial evaluations that uphold the integrity and excellence of the Awards. The Secretary of State for DBT is the contracting authority responsible for meeting this anticipated requirement. The full specification is provided within the Invitation to Tender (ITT) documents; however, the requirement is expected to include the following elements: The procurement of contractor(s) to provide external technical assessment services for the four King's Awards categories listed below. Subject to commercial strategy approval, tenderers will have the opportunity to bid for one or more lots. 1. Lot 1; Innovation: Recognising companies that have demonstrated commercial success through: - invention, design, production (in respect of goods) - performance (in respect of services, including advice) - marketing, distribution, after sale support of goods or services 2. Lot 2; International Trade: Recognising companies that have demonstrated substantial growth in overseas earnings and in commercial success relative to the business size and sector. 3. Lot 3; Promoting Opportunity through social mobility: – for social mobility programmes that help people from disadvantaged backgrounds into successful working lives. 4. Lot 4; Sustainable Development: Recognising companies that have developed commercially successful products, services, and approaches to management which have major benefits for the environment, society and the economy. 5. Lot 5; To recognise Young Founder (New category) – this was announced in the Government’s Small Business Plan. Businesses can apply if they have a founder aged between 18 and 30. It is anticipated the contract shall be for a period of 3 years, with the option to extend for two additional 12-month terms, on a 1+1 basis. The requirement has an estimated total value of £762,000.00 ex-VAT for all 5 Lots. Background of Kings Award The Kings award for Enterprise (previously knowns as the Queens award) was established in 1965 and is the highest official awards programme in the UK. It is the most prestigious award for UK businesses for outstanding achievement. Overview of Requirement The successful contractor(s) for the respective category lot(s), will be responsible for the appraisal of all applications (aka cases), submitted. There are four key outcomes to this process which must be delivered by the deadlines set by the KAO for each round: - Initial technical assessment of each case to identify a shortlist of possible Award recipients and reserve cases. - Draft summaries of shortlisted cases and a report to be reviewed and discussed at the Award Judging Panels in January. These reports must be ready by the beginning of December. The Lead assessors must attend these Judging Panels in person and be prepared to talk about each case. - Draft pen pictures of successful applications for inclusion in the King’s Awards Press Book. These are then agreed by the applicant and are used in the official publication on The London Gazette. - Comprehensive feedback for unsuccessful applications. Successful contractors will be required to deliver against deadlines set by the King’s Awards Office for each round in the process and will be expected to demonstrate that their intended assessors have relevant experience and up to date knowledge of the relevant award category and corporate responsibility. The assessors will be required to appraise applications in accordance with the agreed specified criteria and make recommendations to the relevant panel of Judges/Advisory Committee. All comments and decisions will be recorded within the King’s Award online assessment system, so that the King’s Award Office are able to track progress throughout the cycle. Overview of Kings Awards assessment timeline The Kings Award process takes place over a 12-month cycle that commences every year in the beginning of May and concludes the following year in the same month. Please see below a rough guide of the different stage’s applications will need to go through to receive an award: • May - Open round for new applications – Applicants can provide separate submission for either of the 4 categories and are not limited to just one category. • Mid-September - Application period closes, after which assessors access the online application forms and relevant associated material via the King’s Award Office online entry and assessment system. • Mid-October - Delivery of shortlist of entries to the King’s Award Office • Mid-November - Review of the verified financial figures provided by the applicants. • November - Completion of case summary assessments for each short-listed application. • January - The Lead assessor for each category will attend the relevant panel meeting in London to introduce the recommended and reserve cases and to answer any questions that the Panel members may raise. • February - Prime Ministers Advisory Committee (PMAC) takes place. • Early March - Complete winner’s pen pictures for Press Book. • Mid/late March - Delivery of feedback summaries for unsuccessful entrants – all feedback will provide sufficient detail for entrants to use to improve a future entry. • May - Winning recipients of the awards is announced publicly; this concludes the awards for the year. The whole assessment process, including consideration by the Panels of Judges and KAAB, is completed between the closing date for applications and the anniversary of His Majesty Coronation, 6th May. It will be essential that assessors are able to adhere to the strict timelines set out above. Lead assessors will be responsible managing assessors and reassigning work to ensure deadlines are met. Overview of Assessors expected conduct throughout the Kings Award process: o Adherence to government confidentiality and data protection policies. o Access to applications and their assessments will be strictly confined to those directly involved in the assessment process. o Any correspondence relating to applications will need to adhere to the Governments security classification of ‘Official Sensitive’ for handling documents. o Assessors will not be permitted to discuss applications except with others directly involved in the assessment process. o Sharing applicant information between assessors will need to follow the process set by the King’s Awards Office to ensure identity of the applicants/companies are anonymised. o No contact direct contact with between Assessor’s and applicants will be permitted throughout the process. Conflict of Interest: If an assessor has a conflict of interest, no matter how remote, in an organisation from which an application has been assigned to him/her for assessment, he/she should declare it to the person responsible for allocating applications to assessors and to the Lead Assessor so that an alternative assessor can be assigned. The Lead Assessor will be responsible for ensuring the Kings award office is aware. Quality: Assessments will be scrutinised throughout the process before The King grants the awards. It will be essential that the assessments are factually correct, accurate, consistent with the award criteria and written in plain English. Lead Assessor’s will be responsible for ensuring all assessments in their category meet this standard.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

26 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (7)
Compliance (4)
Technical (12)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit bids to deliver assessment services in support of the King’s Awards for Enterprise programme.
--Tenderers will have the opportunity to bid for one or more lots.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS7
--Adherence to government confidentiality and data protection policies.
--Access to applications and their assessments will be strictly confined to those directly involved in the assessment process.
--Any correspondence relating to applications will need to adhere to the Governments security classification of ‘Official Sensitive’ for handling documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Suppliers must be suitably qualified to provide robust, impartial evaluations.
--Suppliers must be capable of upholding the integrity and excellence of the Awards.
--Tenderers will have the opportunity to bid for one or more lots.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS12
--Provision of external technical assessment services for the five King's Awards categories.
--Appraisal of all applications (cases) submitted.
--Initial technical assessment of each case to identify a shortlist of possible Award recipients and reserve cases.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Estimated total value of £762,000.00 ex-VAT for all 5 Lots.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Assessors for King's Awards 2026-2029 is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a defined scope. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on the submission process, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. The CPV code is appropriate. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

Clarity80/100

The description of the requirement is clear, outlining the purpose and the five award categories. The AI-extracted requirements provide a good level of detail on technical and eligibility aspects. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant omission.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and estimated value is present. Contract duration and start date are specified. However, the tender documents themselves are not accessible with content, which is a major gap.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, allowing for broad participation. The value is disclosed, and the opportunity to bid for multiple lots promotes fair competition. The criteria for assessors are objective. E-procurement is implied but not explicitly stated as mandatory.

Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are clear. Financing information is implicitly covered by the estimated value. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the unavailability of document URLs hinder practicality.

No e-submission
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of an annual award cycle.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding, which are common in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of emphasis on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of requirements and award categories
Open procedure allowing broad participation
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration
Well-defined CPV code and NUTS code

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Inability to access tender document content
Lack of clarity on e-submission process
Absence of sustainability and innovation considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide clear and detailed evaluation criteria.
2. Ensure all tender documents are accessible with content and clear URLs.
3. Specify the e-submission platform and process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline