Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Successive deliveries of food products in 2026

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00174117/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Pomorskie, Poland
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Pomorskie
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€273,554
Avg. Bids
0.2
Competition
Low
SME Winners
94%
23,646 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Successive deliveries of food products in 2026

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for successive meat and cold cuts supply to Primary School No. 79 in Gdańsk presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on competitive pricing, demonstrating reliability in supply, and meticulous adherence to all mandatory requirements. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, a strong emphasis on the price forms (Zał. 2.1-2.8) and the offer form (Zał. 1) is paramount.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Consistent Supply of High-Quality Meat Products

Competitive and Value-Driven Pricing

Seamless Procurement Process and Compliance

Key Opportunities
Competitive Pricing Strategy
Local/Regional Presence and Understanding
Simplicity of Requirements
Key Challenges
Lack of Specified Evaluation Criteria

Assume price is the primary differentiator. Focus on submitting the most competitive pricing possible while ensuring all other mandatory and eligibility requirements are met flawlessly. Prepare for a scenario where price is the sole or dominant factor.

Potential for Undisclosed Competition

While the value is not disclosed, the nature of public procurement suggests multiple bidders are likely. Focus on a strong, error-free submission that leaves no room for disqualification on technicalities.

Ensuring Supply Chain Robustness for 'Successive Deliveries'

Clearly articulate in the offer form (Zał. 1) or supporting documents (if allowed) the bidder's capacity and logistical plan to ensure consistent, timely deliveries throughout 2026. Highlight any quality assurance measures for freshness and safety.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established local or regional supplier of meat and cold cuts with a proven track record of reliable, successive deliveries to public institutions or similar clients. The ideal bidder will have efficient logistics, robust quality control processes for fresh produce, and a competitive pricing structure that can absorb potential minor fluctuations while remaining attractive.
Key Requirements
Compliance with Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Meeting Eligibility Requirements
Demonstrating Technical Capability
Satisfying Financial Requirements
Accurate and Complete Submission of Offer Form (Zał. 1)
Accurate and Competitive Pricing in Price Forms (Zał. 2.1-2.8)
Declaration of Non-Exclusion (Zał. 3)
Key Discriminators
Exceptional pricing that significantly undercuts competitors while maintaining quality.
Demonstrated ability to provide a wider range of high-quality meat and cold cuts than competitors, even if only meat is specified.
A proactive approach to communication and problem-solving, showcasing a partnership mentality rather than just a transactional supplier.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly requested, consider a statement in the offer form (Zał. 1) about commitment to fair labor practices within the supply chain, or a commitment to sourcing from local producers where feasible, to subtly enhance the bidder's profile.
Bid Focus Areas
PriceN/A (Assumed High)

Analyze the price forms (Zał. 2.1-2.8) meticulously. Benchmark against known market rates for similar public contracts in the region. Aim for a price that is highly competitive but sustainable. Consider offering slight volume discounts or tiered pricing if the product list allows for it, even if not explicitly requested.

Compliance and DocumentationN/A (Critical)

Ensure absolute accuracy and completeness in all submitted documents, especially the Offer Form (Zał. 1) and the Declaration (Zał. 3). Double-check all dates, company details, and declarations against the tender requirements and legal stipulations. A single error can lead to disqualification.

Technical Capability (Supply Chain & Quality)N/A (High)

While not explicitly detailed, the 'successive supply' implies a need for reliable logistics and quality control. Briefly outline in the Offer Form (Zał. 1) or a supporting annex (if permitted) the bidder's experience in managing regular food deliveries, including quality assurance processes for meat products.

Recommendations6
Master Price Forms (Zał. 2.1-2.8)
CriticalHigh effort

Thoroughly analyze and complete all price forms. Ensure pricing is competitive, sustainable, and reflects the 'successive supply' aspect. Consider offering slight variations or bundles if it enhances value without compromising profitability.

Directly influences the likelihood of winning, especially if price is the primary evaluation factor.
Assume Price is Paramount
CriticalMed effort

Given the absence of specified evaluation criteria, operate under the assumption that price will be the most significant, if not the sole, determinant of the winning bid. Focus all efforts on optimizing pricing while meeting all mandatory requirements.

Ensures bid strategy is aligned with likely procurement priorities.
Flawless Offer Form (Zał. 1) and Declarations (Zał. 3)
CriticalHigh effort

Ensure the Offer Form (Zał. 1) and the Declaration (Zał. 3) are completed with absolute accuracy, without any omissions or errors. This includes all company details, legal declarations, and any required annexes.

Prevents disqualification on technical grounds, which is a common pitfall.
Highlight Supply Chain Reliability
MediumLow effort

In the Offer Form (Zał. 1) or a brief, permitted supporting statement, briefly mention the bidder's experience and capacity for reliable, successive food deliveries. This addresses the 'successive supply' aspect and builds confidence.

Adds a layer of assurance beyond just price, especially if competitors are less experienced in this specific delivery model.
Proactive Clarification on Ambiguities
HighLow effort

If any part of the tender documents (e.g., specific product requirements within meat, delivery windows) is unclear, proactively seek clarification from the Contracting Authority well before the deadline. Document all communications.

Avoids misinterpretations that could lead to non-compliant bids or post-contractual disputes.
Subtle Social Value Statement
LowLow effort

If space permits in Zał. 1 or a permitted annex, include a brief, non-committal statement about commitment to ethical sourcing or local economic contribution. This is a low-effort way to potentially add a positive perception.

May offer a slight edge if the authority has unstated preferences or if multiple bids are otherwise equal.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on the fundamental quality and reliability of meat and cold cuts supply. Emphasize the 'value for money' proposition. If possible, subtly highlight local presence and understanding of regional needs compared to larger, potentially less agile national suppliers.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8b78-4caf-0387-5fad-950001e7169d.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the successive supply of food products in 2026 by Primary School No. 79 in Gdańsk, Poland.

SWZ_SP79-sig.pdfPDF
SWZ_SP79-sig.pdf

This document contains the Specification of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for the successive supply of food products in 2026 for Primary School No. 79 in Gdańsk.

Zał. 1 - Formularz Ofertowy.docxDOC
Zał. 1 - Formularz Ofertowy.docx

This document is a tender offer form for the successive supply of food products in 2026, requiring bidders to provide company details, pricing, and declarations.

Zał. 2.1-2.8 - Formularze Cenowe.xlsxXLS
Zał. 2.1-2.8 - Formularze Cenowe.xlsx

This document contains price forms (Zał. 2.1-2.8) for the successive supply of food products in 2026, specifically for Part 1: meat and cold cuts.

Zał. 3 - Oświadczenie art. 125 .docxDOC
Zał. 3 - Oświadczenie art. 125 .docx

This document contains a bidder's declaration of non-exclusion from the public procurement procedure for the supply of food articles in 2026, based on Polish Public Procurement Law and national security regulations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for successive food supplies in 2026 is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined CPV code. However, it lacks disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, organization details, and a CPV code. The procedure type is indicated, and multiple required documents are listed. However, the absence of a 'reveal date' for the full tender documents and the lack of specified evaluation criteria are minor procedural omissions.

Missing reveal date for full tender documents
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, indicating the subject matter and timeframe. The CPV code provides specific classification. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas bidders must address. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and deadline. Several essential tender documents are attached and summarized. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is not specified, which are significant omissions.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes accessibility. The requirements listed (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are standard. The absence of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could potentially lead to less transparency, but there are no overt signs of tailoring to specific companies.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. E-procurement is indicated. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'Procurement Characteristics' stating 'E-Procurement'. The contract start date and financing information are not provided, and the contract duration is missing.

Contradiction regarding e-submission (indicated as E-Procurement but flagged as 'No e-submission')
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, deadline, and CPV code are populated. The status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender. The main inconsistency is the conflicting information regarding e-submission.

Contradiction regarding e-submission (indicated as E-Procurement but flagged as 'No e-submission')
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender focuses solely on the supply of food products.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Specific CPV code provided
Multiple essential tender documents attached and summarized
Active status with no disputes

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration
Contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value for greater transparency.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure consistency with e-procurement.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline