Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Inspection and Testing of Roof Lines, Anchor, Abseiling, Flagpoles and Fixed Ladders 2026

Open
Deadline
20 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
028656-2026
Value
£192,000
Location
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, United Kingdom
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 03, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£192,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Inspection and Testing of Roof Lines, Anchor, Abseiling, Flagpoles and Fixed Ladders 2026-2030

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender offers a clear description of services and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed documentation and explicit evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general open procedure requirements and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are reported. The procedure is clearly stated as 'Open procedure'.

Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly outline the required services. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, organization, value, and duration is present. However, the critical issue of missing document content and the absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduce the completeness of the tender package.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad accessibility. The value is disclosed, and criteria are generally objective, although specific evaluation criteria are missing. The lack of explicit mention of e-submission is a minor concern for fairness.

Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are specified. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the lack of accessible document content (URLs) hinder practical engagement for potential bidders.

No e-submission
Document URL missing (implied by 'Documents with content/summaries: 0')
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data integrity.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, limiting its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear service description
Reasonable estimated value
Open procedure
Key basic information provided

Concerns

Missing document content
No evaluation criteria specified
No e-submission mentioned
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide full tender documents with content.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
3. Clarify e-submission process and provide relevant URLs.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline