Tender for stair cleaning and window cleaning in Housing Association AAB, Pool Amager

This tender for cleaning services is generally well-structured with a clear description and disclosed value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and practicality.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, utilizing an open procedure and a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the complexity implied by the value. No disputes are reported.

The description of services (stair cleaning and window cleaning) is clear, and the scope (number of housing departments) is specified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and estimated value is present. Documents are indicated as available, but their content is not directly accessible. Key details like contract duration and specific eligibility/technical requirements are missing.

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. The value is disclosed, and the CPV code is appropriate. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. Access to tender documents is provided via an external link.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of direct access to document content and missing information on contract duration and start date reduce practicality. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is appropriate. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical, with the notice date preceding the submission deadline.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.