Skip to main content
Tenders

Provision of Psychological Supervision for Forensic Services staff

Open
Deadline
26 days left
April 23, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
026891-2026
Value
£600,000
Location
Scotland, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 16, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 23, 2026

Budget
£600,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Scotland
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Scottish Police Authority has a requirement for the provision of Psychological Supervision for Forensic Services Staff.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for psychological supervision services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and technical/eligibility requirements, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and includes a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the context. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could lead to procedural challenges.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the basic information is well-documented. However, the absence of specific eligibility, technical capability, and submission requirements leaves significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

No specific eligibility requirements listed
No specific technical capability requirements listed
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadline. However, the critical omission of detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, submission) and the lack of content in the tender documents significantly reduce its completeness.

No specific requirements listed (eligibility, technical, submission)
Documents with content/summaries: 0
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The e-procurement characteristic is positive. The lack of specific requirements, while impacting clarity, does not appear to unfairly favour specific companies at this stage. However, the absence of clear evaluation criteria could be a concern.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a specified contract start date implied by the deadline. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. The 'E-Procurement' characteristic is noted, but the 'No e-submission' flag suggests a potential manual component or lack of clarity on the submission platform.

No e-submission
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated logically. There are no noted disputes or suspensions. The dates are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
Proper CPV code provided
Active status with reasonable deadline

Concerns

Missing specific eligibility, technical, and submission requirements
No evaluation criteria specified
No content available for tender documents
Potential lack of full e-submission

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed eligibility, technical capability, and submission requirements.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
3. Upload content or summaries for the tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline