Skip to main content
Tenders

003264 - Single Person Discount (SPD) Monitoring Service Review

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
023496-2026
Value
£124,800
Location
Tees Valley and Durham, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£124,800
Duration
24 months
Location
Tees Valley and Durham
Type
Open Procedure
69
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Previously a simple form was completed where the customer signs to confirm they are the only resident adult liable for Council Tax, before SPD is awarded. Whilst this option is still available to customers, from 2017 they can also complete an intelligent online open channel form that transfers to Durham County Council's (DCC) council tax system and automatically updates the liability awarding the discount. This has removed the need for any manual intervention from DCC Awards Officers.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific submission requirements listed in the provided text.]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific mandatory exclusion grounds listed in the provided text.]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific eligibility requirements listed in the provided text.]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific technical capability requirements listed in the provided text.]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific financial requirements listed in the provided text.]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

69
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for SPD Monitoring Service Review is generally well-structured but lacks detailed technical and eligibility requirements, and specific sustainability considerations. The process appears fair with an open competition for a below-threshold contract.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance70/100

The tender adheres to general regulatory compliance with a clear CPV code and open competition procedure. Deadlines are provided, but the short submission window might be a concern for some bidders. No major legal disputes are indicated.

Potentially short submission deadline for a service review.
Clarity75/100

The description of the service is clear in its context, explaining the evolution of the SPD process. However, the AI-extracted requirements highlight a lack of specific detailed criteria for evaluation, technical capability, and eligibility, which could be improved.

Lack of specific evaluation criteria.
Absence of detailed technical capability requirements.
Completeness65/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and contract start date are present. However, the lack of content in the tender documents and the absence of detailed requirements impact overall completeness.

No document content available for review.
Missing detailed requirements for exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capability, financial, and submission.
Fairness80/100

The tender is an open competition for a below-threshold contract, suggesting a fair process. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for evaluation, while not explicitly listed, are implied to be objective given the nature of the service. The issue is the lack of explicit documentation of these criteria.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria documentation.
Practicality60/100

While the tender is active with a specified contract start date and duration, the 'Issues' section indicates 'No e-submission', which significantly impacts practicality in modern procurement. The document URL is not explicitly provided in the excerpt.

No e-submission indicated.
Document URLs not explicitly provided in the excerpt.
Data Consistency85/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and timeline are populated. The status is active, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability40/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common in modern tenders aiming for sustainability. This aspect is significantly underdeveloped.

No indication of green procurement criteria.
No mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear basic information provided (title, reference, organization, value, dates).
Open competition procedure for a below-threshold contract.
CPV code accurately classified.
Active status with no reported disputes.

Concerns

Lack of detailed technical, eligibility, and submission requirements.
No explicit evaluation criteria documented.
No e-submission capability indicated.
Absence of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation).

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed technical, eligibility, and submission requirements.
2. Clearly document the evaluation criteria.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects (green, social, innovation) if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline