Skip to main content
Tenders

Mechanical Verge Mowing

Open
Deadline
26 days left
April 22, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027346-2026
Value
£336,000
Location
West Wales and The Valleys, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 15, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 22, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£336,000
Duration
24 months
Location
West Wales and The Valleys
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Provision of Mechanical Verge Mowing Services to Highways throughout Pembrokeshire.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Mechanical Verge Mowing Services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed documentation and specific evaluation criteria, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified CPV code and a clear open competition procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable for a below-threshold procurement. No disputes are reported, indicating a stable regulatory environment for this notice.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear and concise. The AI-extracted requirements list key areas to be addressed by bidders. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap in clarity regarding how submissions will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The submission deadline and contract start date are also provided. However, the lack of content in the tender documents is a significant omission.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is standard. The lack of specific company tailoring is positive. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and financing details limits its practicality for potential bidders. The availability of documents is also hampered by the lack of content.

No e-submission specified
No financing information provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, contributing to high data consistency. The dates provided are sequential and make sense within the procurement timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Open competition procedure

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
No e-submission specified
Limited sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed tender documents with clear content.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria for submissions.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation aspects.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline