Skip to main content
Tenders

Landscaping and basement insulation of Babīte Secondary School (Phase 1)

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
168555
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Pieriga, Latvia
Published
March 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
6 months
Location
Pieriga
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Landscaping and basement insulation of Babīte Secondary School (Phase 1)

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--The tender requires submission forms for the application, bid security, financial information, experience, technical proposal, and financial offer.
--The deadline for submission is 2026-04-10T08:00:00.
--The construction works must be completed within 20 weeks from the day the invitation to start construction works is sent.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements provided in the text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided in the text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided in the text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided in the text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168555_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260323175412.pdf -- 99.6 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the landscaping and insulation of the Babīte Secondary School courtyard, including submission forms for the application, bid security, financial information, experience, technical proposal, and financial offer.

8.pielikums Līguma projektsDOC
8_pielikums_Liguma_projekts_2026_26_MNP_2026_... -- 81.1 KB

This document contains a draft contract for the renovation and reconstruction of the Babīte sports complex and roof in Mārupe, outlining the scope of work, payment terms, and responsibilities of the contracting parties.

NolikumsDOC
NOLIKUMS_MNP_2026_26.docx -- 97.8 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender concerning the landscaping and insulation of the Babīte Secondary School courtyard.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender procedure for the landscaping and insulation of the Babīte Secondary School courtyard, with a submission deadline of April 10, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for landscaping and insulation of Babīte Secondary School courtyard is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the undisclosed estimated value and lack of specified evaluation criteria are notable drawbacks.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear open procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission date. No disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance is presumed based on the structure.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the attached documents outline the requirements and conditions. The submission requirements are detailed, specifying necessary forms and timelines for project completion. However, evaluation criteria are not explicitly stated.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, type of procedure, and contract duration. The submission deadline and tender validity are specified. However, the estimated value of the contract is not disclosed, which impacts overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag suggests potential limitations in full document availability, and the absence of disclosed evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. A contract start date is not explicitly stated, but the contract duration is provided. Financing information is not disclosed. The submission deadline is clear.

Financing information not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract duration aligns with the project completion timeline described in the AI-extracted requirements.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear open procedure and CPV code
Detailed submission requirements and project timelines
Use of e-procurement
Reasonable deadlines and contract duration

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access flag
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value for greater transparency.
2. Clearly state the evaluation criteria to ensure a fair and predictable selection process.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline