Skip to main content
Tenders

Organization and implementation of a nail styling, visage, and makeup course for students of the Wincenty Witos School Complex in Sucha Beskidzka

Open
Deadline
2 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
2026/BZP 00164392/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Małopolskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Małopolskie
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€71,802
Avg. Bids
0.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
53%
6,312 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Organization and implementation of a nail styling, visage, and makeup course for students of the Wincenty Witos School Complex in Sucha Beskidzka

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8669-a0cd-6bb6-056e-e50001aa8ad7.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for organizing and conducting nail styling, makeup, and artistry courses for students at Wincenty Witos School Complex in Sucha Beskidzka, with offers to be submitted electronically.

załączniki edytowalne.docxDOC
załączniki edytowalne.docx

This document contains the offer form, a declaration of non-exclusion from the procedure, and a personal data processing clause, all required for submitting a bid for organizing nail styling and makeup courses.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for vocational training services is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable CPV code. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure type. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes are indicated. The procedure type is 'None', which is unusual and could imply a simplified procedure, but lacks explicit justification.

Procedure type 'None' is unusual and lacks explicit justification.
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, specifying the subject of the training and the target audience. The CPV code is appropriate. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their offers will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and CPV code. The submission deadline is provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, which are significant omissions.

Estimated value not disclosed.
Missing contract duration.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The value is not disclosed, which can be a concern for fairness. However, there are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, and the criteria for selection are not detailed, which is a drawback.

Value not disclosed.
Missing evaluation criteria.
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. E-procurement is indicated. However, the lack of disclosed financial information and contract duration makes it difficult for potential bidders to assess the project's scope and financial viability. The contract start date is also missing.

Value not disclosed.
Missing contract duration.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria.

Strengths

Clear title and description
Appropriate CPV code provided
E-procurement utilized
Tender documents available

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration
Potentially short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Specify the contract duration and start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline