Development of construction concept documentation, author's supervision and sequential execution of construction works “Development of mobility and public transport connection points at Upes prospekts 15A, Ogre, Ogre municipality”

This tender offers a generally clear process for construction design and works, but lacks explicit evaluation criteria and faces restricted document access, impacting fairness and practicality. Sustainability considerations are minimal.

The tender adheres to general legal requirements for an open procedure with a reasonable deadline and proper CPV coding. The specified tender validity period is standard. However, the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria raises a concern regarding procedural transparency and fairness, potentially impacting legal defensibility if challenges arise.

The tender title and description are sufficiently clear, outlining the scope of works and location. Key documents like requirement specifications and regulations are identified. However, the absence of disclosed evaluation criteria makes the overall requirements less clearly defined for bidders regarding how their submissions will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and deadlines. Four tender documents are listed. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and contract duration is not specified, which are significant omissions for a complete picture of the procurement.

The tender is an open procedure and uses e-procurement, which are positive aspects for fairness. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag indicates that not all relevant documentation might be fully accessible to all potential bidders, potentially creating an uneven playing field. The absence of disclosed evaluation criteria also hinders objective assessment.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a practical aspect. However, the identified issue of 'Restricted document access' directly impacts practicality, as bidders may not be able to obtain all necessary information easily. The lack of specified contract duration also makes it harder for bidders to plan their resources effectively.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, dates (reveal, submission, opening), and CPV codes are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical for a procurement process.

The tender is flagged as 'EU Funded' and 'E-Procurement' and 'WTO/GPA', but there are no explicit mentions or requirements related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability in the tender's characteristics.