Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login9 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
3 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the supply and installation of suspended ceilings at the Latvian University Academic Center, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation methods.
This document contains the regulations and technical specifications for an open tender by the University of Latvia for the supply and installation of suspended ceilings in the Rakstu House of the LU Academic Center.
This document contains the basic data for tender LU 2026/18 concerning the supply and installation of suspended ceilings at the University of Latvia Academic Center, with a submission deadline of March 30, 2026.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for suspended ceiling supply and installation is generally well-structured but lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has potential document access restrictions, slightly impacting clarity and fairness.
The tender appears to comply with general legal frameworks, including the use of proper CPV codes and an open procedure. Deadlines are provided and seem reasonable for the scope. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the 'Restricted document access' flag, which, if true, could indicate a compliance issue regarding full document availability to all potential bidders.
The tender title and description are clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant omission that affects the clarity of the selection process. Requirements are referenced in attached documents, which is standard, but the explicit clarity of these criteria is not guaranteed without their direct presentation.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration (though short at 1 month), and tender validity. Key documents are referenced. However, the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria means that the full picture of what is required from a bidder is not immediately apparent from the summary information provided.
The tender uses an open procedure and e-procurement, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag raises concerns about equal access to all necessary information. The absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria also makes it harder for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged, potentially impacting objective assessment.
The tender specifies e-procurement and provides document URLs (implicitly through the document list). The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, but the duration is provided. Financing information is absent, which is a potential drawback. The short contract duration of 1 month might also present practical challenges for suppliers.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated correctly. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided for reveal, submission, and opening are logically sequential.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This limits the sustainability score as these elements are not integrated into the procurement characteristics.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required