Skip to main content
Tenders

Maintenance and upkeep works of the administrative territory of Rojas parish

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
167653
Value
€141,676
Location
Kurzeme, Latvia
Published
March 08, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 08, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€141,676
Duration
12 months
Location
Kurzeme
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€336,807
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
3,844 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Maintenance and upkeep works of the administrative territory of Rojas parish

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-07T09:00:00.
--Bids must be submitted in the format specified in the tender documents.
--All required documentation, including the bidder's application form, must be included.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by the relevant legislation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally registered to perform the services.
--Bidders must possess the necessary permits and licenses to operate in the relevant jurisdiction.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must demonstrate experience in performing similar maintenance and upkeep works.
--Bidders must provide details of their technical equipment and personnel available for the contract.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must demonstrate sufficient financial stability to undertake the contract.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167653_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260308140026.pdf -- 106.2 KB

This document outlines the requirements and selection criteria for bidders participating in a tender for maintenance and upkeep services in the Talsi municipality.

Nolikums un tā pielikumi TNP 2026/25DOC
1.pielikums Pretendenta pieteikums TNP 2026_2... -- 22.7 KB

This document is a bidder's application form for the open tender "Maintenance and upkeep works of the administrative territory of Rojas parish", identification No. TNP 2026/25.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a public procurement tender for maintenance and upkeep works in the administrative territory of Rojas parish, with a submission deadline of April 7, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for maintenance and upkeep works in Rojas parish is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the absence of specified evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the provision of a CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The presence of mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements indicates adherence to legal frameworks.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected. The existence of specific documents for technical specifications and application forms contributes to clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and deadlines. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria within the provided information could be considered a gap.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with a disclosed value, promoting fairness. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag raises concerns about full document availability to all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a contract start date implicitly through the opening date. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and while e-submission is implied by 'e-procurement', it's not explicitly stated as the sole method. The duration is clearly defined.

No explicit mention of e-submission as the sole method
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Reasonable deadlines and timeline
Disclosed estimated value
Open procedure and e-procurement

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clarify document access and ensure full availability.
2. Publish detailed evaluation criteria.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline