Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Asphalt 2026

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
790e670a-2c9b-47a3-a6ab-23e0ffda5c9a
Value
kr24,000,000
Location
Midtjylland, Denmark
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Budget
kr24,000,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Midtjylland
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Asphalt tender 2026

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for asphalt works in 2026 by Ringkøbing-Skjern Kommune is generally well-structured, with clear financial and basic information. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and technical requirements, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines are specified, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes are noted. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural issue.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the estimated value is disclosed. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed technical, eligibility, financial, and submission requirements leaves significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
No specific eligibility requirements listed
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, organization, estimated value, and deadline are present. Three tender documents are indicated, but their content is not directly accessible, and crucial details like contract duration and specific requirements are missing.

No document content available
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is open. However, the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation and the absence of detailed requirements could potentially lead to subjective assessments.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the submission process is not fully detailed, and there is no explicit mention of contract start date or financing information. The availability of documents is through external links, which is a standard practice but requires user action.

No e-submission details provided
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, organization, value, and deadline are populated. The tender is active with no reported suspension or disputes. Dates are logical, with the publication date preceding the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender details. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Estimated value and CPV code provided
Active status and e-procurement characteristic
Tender documents indicated as available

Concerns

Lack of specific evaluation criteria
Absence of detailed technical, eligibility, financial, and submission requirements
Missing contract duration and start date
No sustainability or innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Provide detailed requirements for eligibility, technical capability, financial standing, and submission.
3. Incorporate sustainability and innovation aspects into the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline