Skip to main content
Tenders

Capital Investment – Planned Roofing Replacement Programme 2026 – 2031

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
024285-2026
Value
£12,000,000
Location
Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 02, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£12,000,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Greater Manchester
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The works shall include, but are not limited to: Pitched Roofing (Lots 1 & 2): Planned replacement of pitched roofs, including slate and tile; replacement of gutters, soffits, and fascias; and works to chimneys and associated leadwork. Flat Roofing (Lot 3): Planned replacement of existing felt, single-ply, or other liquid-applied flat roof systems, including the installation of fall protection systems. Conservation & Complex Roofing (Lot 4): Specialist replacements on listed buildings and properties within conservation areas. This requires natural slate, stone, or heritage materials and strict adherence to planning permissions and historic building techniques.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (8)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids must be submitted in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, and Lithuanian.
--No specific submission forms or templates are mentioned, implying bidders may need to create their own submission documents.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be capable of undertaking the described roofing works.
--Bidders must be able to provide services in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, and Lithuanian.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Pitched Roofing (Lots 1 & 2): Experience in planned replacement of pitched roofs, including slate and tile.
--Experience in replacement of gutters, soffits, and fascias.
--Experience in works to chimneys and associated leadwork.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., turnover, bonding) are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a planned roofing replacement programme is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a disclosed budget. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission forms, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable timeline for a project of this scale. No immediate regulatory compliance issues are apparent from the provided text. The absence of specified mandatory exclusion grounds is noted.

Clarity80/100

The description of works is detailed and well-categorized into four lots, providing a good understanding of the scope. Technical requirements are clearly outlined for each lot. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The contract start date is also provided. However, the absence of content for the tender documents and the lack of specific submission forms or templates reduce its completeness.

No document content available
No specific submission forms or templates mentioned
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to all bidders and the estimated value is disclosed. The criteria for technical capability are objective and based on experience. The requirement for bids to be submitted in multiple languages (English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, and Lithuanian) could be seen as an attempt to broaden participation, but might also be an unusual requirement if the contracting authority's primary language is English. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Requirement for submission in multiple languages (Estonian, Latvian, Polish, Lithuanian) may be unusual if not explicitly justified by the contracting authority's operational needs.
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of specific submission forms or templates make the submission process less practical for bidders. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission specified
No specific submission forms or templates mentioned
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logical and do not indicate any immediate inconsistencies. No disputes or suspensions are reported.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a moderate approach to sustainability considerations.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear and detailed description of works by lot
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
Objective technical capability requirements
Active status and clear reference number

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No content available for tender documents
Lack of e-submission specification
Unclear submission format

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria to provide clarity for bidders.
2. Provide access to full tender documents or at least summaries.
3. Clarify the preferred method of submission (e-submission preferred).

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline