Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of fuel and autogas at a gas station

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
167040
Value
€40,000
Location
Latvia
Published
March 09, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 24, 2026

Tender Opening

March 24, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€40,000
Duration
12 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€160,194
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
95%
4,915 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of fuel and autogas at a gas station

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

70%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender presents a moderate opportunity for fuel and autogas supply. The strategy should focus on competitive pricing, reliable supply chain, and demonstrating a clear understanding of the contract's operational needs. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, a strong emphasis on meeting all stated requirements and offering a robust, cost-effective solution will be paramount.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Cost-Effective Fuel and Autogas Supply

Uninterrupted Service for 'ORNAMENTS' Filling Station

Commitment to Meeting All Contractual Obligations

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for a strong focus on meeting all mandatory requirements and offering a highly competitive price.
The relatively low estimated value (40,000.0) suggests a focus on operational efficiency and cost control rather than complex innovation or extensive social value initiatives.
The tender is for a 12-month duration, indicating a need for a stable and consistent supplier, which can be a differentiator for established players.
Key Challenges
Absence of detailed evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize the bid for specific scoring mechanisms. The focus must be on a comprehensive and compliant submission.

Thoroughly review all provided documents ('Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija', 'Nolikums', '7.pielikums_līguma projekts') to infer the likely priorities of the Contracting Authority. Ensure all mandatory requirements are met with absolute precision. Offer a highly competitive price as a primary differentiator.

Potential for price-sensitive competition given the estimated value and lack of explicit emphasis on non-price factors.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to ensure a competitive yet profitable pricing strategy. Explore all possible efficiencies in logistics and procurement to offer the lowest possible price without compromising quality or reliability.

Limited information on specific technical, financial, and eligibility requirements means bidders must assume standard industry practices and be prepared to provide comprehensive documentation.

Proactively include all standard documentation and evidence of capability that would typically be required for such a supply contract. Err on the side of providing more information rather than less, demonstrating robust capability.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established fuel and autogas supplier with a proven track record of reliable delivery, competitive pricing, and a strong logistical network within Latvia (LV00 NUTS region). The ideal bidder will have experience managing similar volume contracts and a clear understanding of the operational demands of a filling station.
Key Requirements
Supply of A 95 gasoline, diesel, and autogas
Compliance with exclusion grounds
Meeting technical and financial proposal requirements (as detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija')
Adherence to the draft supply contract terms ('7.pielikums_līguma projekts')
Delivery within the specified duration (12 months)
Key Discriminators
The most competitive pricing for the specified fuel and autogas types.
Demonstrated reliability of supply chain and delivery network within Latvia.
A clear and concise proposal that directly addresses all requirements outlined in the tender documents, particularly the draft contract.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider a brief statement on commitment to ethical sourcing and responsible business practices, aligning with general good corporate citizenship.
Bid Focus Areas
Price

Offer the most competitive price possible by optimizing supply chain costs and operational efficiencies. This will be the primary driver of success given the lack of other specified evaluation criteria.

Compliance with all mandatory requirements

Ensure 100% adherence to all exclusion grounds, technical, financial, and submission requirements as detailed in the tender documents. Any non-compliance will lead to disqualification.

Reliability of Supply

Provide evidence of a robust and reliable supply chain, including contingency plans for potential disruptions. Highlight logistical capabilities within the LV00 region.

Recommendations5
Thoroughly Analyze All Tender Documents
CriticalHigh effort

Scrutinize 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija', 'Nolikums', and '7.pielikums_līguma projekts' to fully understand the scope, obligations, and implied priorities of the Contracting Authority. Pay close attention to the draft contract's terms and conditions.

Ensures full compliance and identifies potential risks or areas for competitive advantage.
Prioritize Competitive Pricing
CriticalHigh effort

Given the absence of specified evaluation criteria, assume price will be a dominant factor. Develop a cost-effective pricing strategy that is both competitive and profitable. Conduct detailed cost analysis.

Maximizes the chances of winning in a potentially price-driven competition.
Demonstrate Supply Chain Reliability
HighMed effort

Highlight your company's proven ability to ensure consistent and timely delivery of fuel and autogas. Provide details on logistical capabilities, storage, and any contingency plans.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to meet the ongoing operational needs of the filling station.
Prepare Comprehensive Documentation
HighMed effort

Anticipate standard requirements for technical capability, financial standing, and eligibility. Prepare all necessary certificates, references, and financial statements in advance, even if not explicitly listed.

Avoids last-minute issues and demonstrates preparedness and professionalism.
Clarify Ambiguities
MediumLow effort

If any aspects of the tender documents are unclear, particularly regarding technical specifications or contractual obligations, submit formal clarification requests to the Contracting Authority well before the deadline.

Reduces the risk of misinterpretation and ensures the bid accurately reflects the requirements.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and cost-effective solution for 'ORNAMENTS' by emphasizing a strong supply chain, competitive pricing, and a clear understanding of the operational needs of a filling station. Highlight the ability to meet all contractual obligations without fail.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific submission requirements detailed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific exclusion grounds detailed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific eligibility requirements detailed in the provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific technical capability requirements detailed in the provided text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific financial requirements detailed in the provided text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167040_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260309193251.pdf -- 98.5 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the purchase of fuel and autogas at a filling station, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical, and financial proposal requirements.

1.pielikums_tehniskā specifikācijaDOC
1_pielikums_tehniska_specifikacija.docx -- 24.7 KB

This document contains the technical specification for the procurement of fuel and autogas, outlining the estimated annual volume and clarifying that the actual purchase volume may vary.

7.pielikums_līguma projektsDOC
7_pielikums_piegades_liguma_projekts.docx -- 29.7 KB

This document contains a draft supply contract for fuel and autogas, outlining the terms and conditions for the purchase of A 95 gasoline, diesel, and autogas by the Customer from the Supplier.

NolikumsDOC
ORN_1_16_2026_5_nolikums.docx -- 50.0 KB

This document contains the regulations for a procurement procedure concerning the purchase of fuel and autogas at a gas station.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for fuel and autogas procurement is generally well-structured with clear basic information and attached documents. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and potential restrictions on document access, impacting fairness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, a specified CPV code (though broad), and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the provided information. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the structure.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, and essential documents like technical specifications and contract drafts are provided. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed exclusion/eligibility requirements reduces overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed exclusion/eligibility requirements
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Key documents such as technical specifications, contract draft, and procedural regulations are attached. However, the lack of detailed requirements in the AI-extracted section suggests some information might be missing or not explicitly detailed in the provided text.

AI-extracted requirements section is largely empty
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via an open procedure and uses e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The value is disclosed, and criteria are generally objective, although specific evaluation criteria are not detailed. There are concerns about restricted document access, which could impact fairness.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential practical hurdle. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent.

No e-submission indicated
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logically sequenced. The CPV code is present.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Attached essential documents (technical spec, contract draft)
Open procedure and e-procurement usage
Disclosed estimated value and duration

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access
Lack of detailed exclusion/eligibility requirements
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish evaluation criteria.
2. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline