Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Execution of construction works involving the renovation and replacement of cornice flashing, and renovation of the roof covering with sealing of the orangery in the Banialuka Puppet Theatre building

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00169915/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Śląskie, Poland
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Śląskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Execution of construction works involving the renovation and replacement of cornice flashing, and renovation of the roof covering with sealing of the orangery in the Banialuka Puppet Theatre building

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender requires specialized building renovation works focused on roofing and facade elements of a cultural institution. A winning strategy will emphasize technical expertise, a clear understanding of heritage building considerations (implied by the nature of the building), and a commitment to quality execution. While social value and innovation are not explicitly requested, proactive inclusion can provide a competitive edge.

Key Winning Messages

Expertise in heritage building envelope restoration and specialized roofing solutions.

Commitment to quality, durability, and minimal disruption to the theatre's operations.

Proactive approach to risk management and site safety.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to define value through a well-articulated proposal.
The focus on specific, technical renovation tasks allows for demonstration of specialized expertise.
The absence of explicit 'Green Procurement' or 'Social Aspects' requirements allows for differentiation by proactively incorporating these elements.
Key Challenges
The absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to tailor the bid effectively.

Assume a balanced evaluation focusing on technical merit, price (if disclosed later), and overall value. Emphasize all technical requirements and provide a clear, competitive price. Highlight experience and quality assurance as key value propositions.

Limited information in tender documents (AI-extracted summaries indicate no content).

Thoroughly review all provided documents, even if AI summaries are empty. If possible, attend a site visit or request clarification from the contracting authority regarding any ambiguities or missing details, especially concerning the condition of the building and specific material specifications.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A building contractor with proven experience in heritage building renovations, specifically in roofing, facade repairs, and specialized materials like polycarbonate and torch-applied roofing felt. The bidder should possess a strong track record of delivering projects on time and within budget, with a skilled workforce capable of handling complex demolition and reassembly tasks. Experience with public sector tenders and a commitment to quality assurance are essential.
Key Requirements
Renovation including replacement of cornice flashing with partial demolition and reassembly of cement tile roofing.
Replacement of the orangery covering from steel sheet metal to torch-applied roofing felt on sheathing with OSB3 boards.
Replacement of the arched skylight glazing.
Replacement of polycarbonate sheet covering (main entrance - canopy) with renovation of the wooden structure.
Replacement of flashing, gutters, and downpipes.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience with similar heritage building renovations and specialized roofing systems.
A detailed, proactive approach to project phasing and minimizing disruption to the theatre's operations.
A commitment to using high-quality, durable materials and employing skilled craftspeople.
Proactive inclusion of sustainability measures (e.g., waste reduction, material sourcing) and community engagement, even if not mandated.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to employing local labour where feasible, prioritizing individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds or those seeking apprenticeships in construction trades.
Implement a comprehensive waste management plan focusing on recycling and responsible disposal of construction materials.
Offer to provide a site visit or presentation for local educational institutions on heritage building conservation techniques.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability

Provide detailed methodologies for each technical requirement, referencing past successful projects. Include CVs of key personnel and evidence of relevant certifications. Emphasize the specific skills required for demolition, reassembly, and working with specialized materials like polycarbonate and torch-applied felt.

Price

Develop a competitive and realistic pricing strategy. Ensure all costs are accounted for, including potential unforeseen issues. Clearly outline any cost-saving measures or efficiencies offered.

Overall Value Proposition

Articulate how the bidder's approach will deliver long-term value, focusing on the durability of the repairs, minimal future maintenance, and the preservation of the building's architectural integrity. Highlight a commitment to quality and client satisfaction.

Recommendations7
Detail Technical Methodologies for Roofing and Flashing
CriticalHigh effort

Provide granular detail on the proposed methods for replacing cornice flashing, demolishing and reassembling cement tile roofing, and installing torch-applied roofing felt on OSB3 boards for the orangery. Include specific techniques, materials, and quality control measures for each step.

Demonstrates technical competence and reduces perceived risk for the contracting authority.
Proactively Address Unspecified Evaluation Criteria
HighMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume a balanced approach. Develop a proposal that excels in technical merit, offers a competitive price, and clearly articulates the overall value and risk mitigation strategies. Highlight experience and quality assurance as key differentiators.

Maximizes scoring potential across all likely evaluation facets.
Highlight Heritage Building Experience
HighMed effort

Emphasize any experience working on heritage or culturally significant buildings. This demonstrates an understanding of the unique challenges and sensitivities involved in such projects, even if not explicitly stated as a requirement.

Positions the bidder as a specialist, increasing confidence.
Request Clarification on Tender Documents
MediumLow effort

Given the AI summaries indicate no content, actively seek clarification from the contracting authority regarding the full content of the tender documents (STWIORB.pdf, 26 Banialuka akt p.pdf, etc.) and any specific material or site condition details.

Ensures a fully informed bid and avoids potential misinterpretations.
Incorporate Local Employment and Waste Management
MediumMed effort

Proactively include commitments to local employment and a robust waste management plan, focusing on recycling. This adds value beyond the explicit requirements and aligns with broader public sector expectations.

Enhances the bid's social responsibility profile and potential scoring.
Develop a Detailed Risk Management Plan
HighMed effort

Identify potential risks (e.g., unforeseen structural issues during demolition, weather delays, material availability) and outline specific mitigation strategies for each. This demonstrates foresight and preparedness.

Reduces perceived risk for the contracting authority and builds confidence.
Address Skylight Glazing and Orangery Covering Specifically
CriticalHigh effort

Provide detailed technical proposals for the replacement of the arched skylight glazing and the orangery covering from steel sheet metal to torch-applied roofing felt. This is a critical and specialized aspect of the works.

Directly addresses core technical challenges and demonstrates specialized knowledge.
Competitive Positioning
Position as a specialist in heritage building envelope restoration, emphasizing precision, quality, and minimal disruption. Highlight experience with similar materials and complex roofing systems. Offer a comprehensive, well-documented approach that addresses all technical requirements with clear methodologies and a robust risk management plan. If possible, subtly introduce sustainability and social value elements to stand out.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (7)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Offer submission deadline: 2026-04-08T11:00:00Z
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information in the text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Renovation including replacement of cornice flashing with partial demolition and reassembly of cement tile roofing.
--Replacement of the side entrance canopy covering from trapezoidal sheet metal to flat sheet metal, with painting of the steel structure.
--Replacement of polycarbonate sheet covering (main entrance - canopy) with renovation of the wooden structure.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

14 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de89d0-0785-bc3e-056e-e50001aaade5.pdf

This document is a tender notice for construction works involving the renovation of the cornice flashing and roof covering, including sealing the orangery at the Banialuka Puppet Theatre.

26 Banialuka akt p.pdfPDF
26 Banialuka akt p.pdf -- 220.1 KB

No content extracted

26 Banialuka oran akt p.pdfPDF
26 Banialuka oran akt p.pdf -- 209.8 KB

No content extracted

STWIORB.pdfPDF
STWIORB.pdf -- 396.6 KB

No content extracted

ul._Mickiewicza_20_i_3_Maja_9b_-_opinia_dot._remontu.pdfPDF
ul._Mickiewicza_20_i_3_Maja_9b_-_opinia_dot._... -- 64.5 KB

No content extracted

SWZ.docxDOC
SWZ.docx

This document contains the Specifications of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for construction works involving the renovation and replacement of flashing on a cornice, and renovation of the roof covering with sealing of a conservatory at the Banialuka Puppet Theatre.

SWZ - podpisany.pdfPDF
SWZ - podpisany.pdf

This document contains the Specifications of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for the renovation and roofing works of the Banialuka Puppet Theatre building.

SWZ - Załącznik nr 1.docxDOC
SWZ - Załącznik nr 1.docx

This document contains a tender offer form for construction works involving the renovation of a theatre building, requiring bidders to provide company details, pricing, warranty information, and declarations.

SWZ - Załącznik nr 2.docxDOC
SWZ - Załącznik nr 2.docx

This document is a bidder's declaration of not being subject to exclusion and meeting the participation conditions for a public procurement procedure concerning renovation works at the Banialuka Puppet Theatre.

SWZ - Załącznik nr 3.docxDOC
SWZ - Załącznik nr 3.docx

This document is a declaration by a resource provider confirming they are not subject to exclusion and meet the participation requirements for the renovation of the Banialuka Puppet Theatre building.

SWZ - Załącznik nr 4.docxDOC
SWZ - Załącznik nr 4.docx

This document contains a draft contract for construction works, specifically the renovation of a theatre's cornice, roof, and orangery, including details on the subject of the contract, general provisions, and personnel.

SWZ - Załącznik nr 6.docxDOC
SWZ - Załącznik nr 6.docx

This document contains a declaration for joint bidders regarding the performance of construction works for the renovation of the Banialuka Puppet Theatre building.

SWZ- Załącznik nr 7.docxDOC
SWZ- Załącznik nr 7.docx

This document is a commitment from a third-party entity to provide resources to a bidder for the construction works related to the renovation of the Banialuka Puppet Theatre building.

SWZ - Załącznik nr 8.docxDOC
SWZ - Załącznik nr 8.docx

This document contains a declaration of capital group affiliation, required from bidders for the renovation of the Banialuka Puppet Theatre building.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for construction works is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a good set of supporting documents. However, it lacks crucial financial details and specific evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices with a clear CPV code and location. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short. The procedure type is not explicitly stated, which is a minor omission. No disputes are indicated.

Procedure type not explicitly stated
Clarity80/100

The description of works is detailed and specific, outlining the scope of renovation and replacement tasks. Technical requirements are clearly listed. However, evaluation criteria are missing, which hinders full clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, and a detailed description of works. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and contract duration is missing, which are significant omissions for a complete tender package.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. Technical requirements are specific to the scope of work and do not appear to be tailored to a specific company. The disclosure of value is missing, which is a concern for transparency.

Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a submission deadline. However, the lack of explicit information regarding contract start date and financing details reduces its practicality for potential bidders.

No explicit contract start date
No financing information provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code and location are consistent. No disputes or suspensions are noted, and the dates provided are logical within the context of a tender.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Detailed technical requirements
Comprehensive set of supporting documents (SWZ forms, contract draft)
Use of e-procurement

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for submitted bids.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline