Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction of gasification equipment to ensure continuity of technological processes (development of construction design documentation, supervision, construction work) (3 circuits)

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
168917
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latgale, Latvia
Published
March 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
9 months
Location
Latgale
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of gasification equipment to ensure continuity of technological processes (development of construction design documentation, supervision, construction work) (3 circuits)

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Submission of technical and financial proposals.
--Tender deadline: 2026-04-14T09:00:00.
--Construction design documentation submission deadline: 5 months from contract signing.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds provided in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be able to develop construction design documentation.
--Bidders must be able to perform author's supervision.
--Bidders must be able to carry out construction works.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Development of construction design documentation (BID).
--Author's supervision.
--Construction works for gasification equipment to ensure continuity of technological processes (3 contours).
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements provided in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168917_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260323120433.pdf -- 96.5 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the construction of gasification facilities, including technical and financial proposal submissions, and evaluation criteria.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemZIP
AADSO_2026_5_Nolikums_pielikumi.zip -- 1.7 MB

This document contains the regulations and application forms for an open tender concerning the construction of gasification facilities.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for the construction of gasification equipment to ensure the continuity of technological processes, including the development of construction design documentation, author's supervision, and construction work.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for gasification equipment construction is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria raises concerns about transparency and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the procedure type.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements outline the necessary capabilities. The technical specification document is available and required. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria detracts from overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, type of procedure, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for a tender of this nature.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement characteristics, promoting fairness. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag and the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria suggest potential limitations in full transparency and objective assessment.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential manual or less streamlined submission process. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission (flagged by system, contradicts e-procurement characteristic)
Financing information not explicitly detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical and consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Open procedure with e-procurement characteristics
Clear technical requirements and scope of work
Reasonable contract duration and tender validity period
CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Potential issues with e-submission process

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Clarify the document access procedure and ensure full accessibility for all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline