Skip to main content
Tenders

Architectural Services - Option Appraisal Sites

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
028127-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Greater Manchester
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Wythenshawe Community Housing Group (WCHG) is undertaking preliminary market engagement in relation to the potential appointment of an architectural practice to support the redevelopment of a number of residential sites within the wider Wythenshawe Civic Centre regeneration programme. The opportunity is expected to cover all RIBA Stages, initially focusing on early design stages, and forms part of a wider ambition to deliver high-quality, sustainable homes at scale. This engagement is specifically targeted at experienced architectural practices with proven expertise in large-scale residential development, strong understanding of relevant regulatory requirements, and demonstrable experience of delivering similar schemes. Only organisations with the appropriate capability, capacity, and sector-specific knowledge are encouraged to respond.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Experienced architectural practices.
--Proven expertise in large-scale residential development.
--Strong understanding of relevant regulatory requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Support for the redevelopment of a number of residential sites.
--Cover all RIBA Stages, initially focusing on early design stages.
--Deliver high-quality, sustainable homes at scale.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is for architectural services and is in the planning stage. It has a clear description of requirements but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, with a clear CPV code and no immediate red flags regarding disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The deadline is relatively short, but not critically so for a planning stage engagement. The absence of a specified reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the required services is clear, outlining the scope (RIBA Stages, early design focus) and the desired expertise (large-scale residential development, regulatory understanding). The eligibility requirements are well-defined.

Completeness70/100

While basic information like title, reference, and organization are present, crucial details such as the estimated value and specific submission requirements are missing. The lack of content in attached documents further reduces completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
No specific submission requirements detailed
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness by clearly stating the need for experienced practices and objective criteria (capability, capacity, sector knowledge). However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

Value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is in a planning stage, which explains some practical limitations. The absence of e-submission details and financing information, along with the lack of document content, hinders immediate practical assessment. The contract start date and duration are provided.

No e-submission specified
Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV, and deadlines are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The description mentions a 'wider ambition to deliver high-quality, sustainable homes at scale,' indicating a general awareness of sustainability. However, there are no specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria detailed in the tender.

Not green procurement specified
No social criteria specified

Strengths

Clear description of required services and expertise
Well-defined eligibility criteria
Presence of essential tender metadata (title, reference, CPV)
Tender is in planning stage, allowing for market engagement

Concerns

Lack of disclosed estimated value
Absence of specific evaluation criteria
Missing details on submission requirements and e-submission
No specific sustainability or social criteria

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract to enhance transparency.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for assessing bids.
3. Provide more detailed information on submission procedures and document content.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline