Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Development and author's supervision of the construction project 'Energy efficiency improvement measures for Varakļāni Secondary School at Jaunatnes iela 2, Varakļāni, Madona municipality'

Open
Deadline
22 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
169234
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vidzeme, Latvia
Published
March 29, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 29, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Tender Opening

April 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
16 months
Location
Vidzeme
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€83,543
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
100%
7,536 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development and author's supervision of the construction project 'Energy efficiency improvement measures for Varakļāni Secondary School at Jaunatnes iela 2, Varakļāni, Madona municipality'

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender requires specialized expertise in energy efficiency project design and author supervision for a public school. A winning bid will emphasize proven technical capability, a clear understanding of school infrastructure, and a commitment to delivering long-term value, even without explicit social value requirements.

Key Winning Messages

Proven Expertise in School Energy Efficiency: Demonstrating a track record of successful, cost-effective energy efficiency upgrades in educational facilities.

Seamless Project Delivery: Guaranteeing a smooth transition from design to construction oversight, minimizing disruption to school operations.

Long-Term Value and Sustainability: Focusing on solutions that deliver lasting energy savings and contribute to a more sustainable learning environment.

Key Opportunities
Leverage specific experience with educational buildings.
Highlight cost-effectiveness and long-term operational savings.
Propose innovative (even if not explicitly requested) design solutions.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria.

Assume a balanced evaluation of technical merit, experience, and price. Focus on clearly articulating the value proposition across all stated requirements and demonstrating superior technical capability.

No explicit mention of Green Procurement or Social Aspects.

While not mandatory, subtly weave in sustainability benefits and community impact (e.g., improved learning environment, reduced operational costs for the municipality) into the proposal to demonstrate a holistic approach.

Potential for competitive pricing pressure.

Focus on demonstrating value for money by highlighting the long-term savings and operational efficiencies of the proposed solutions, rather than solely competing on the lowest price.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established engineering or architectural firm with a strong portfolio of successfully completed energy efficiency retrofitting projects, particularly within the public sector or educational institutions. They should possess a dedicated team with relevant certifications and a demonstrated history of effective author supervision and project management.
Key Requirements
Ability to develop construction projects
Ability to provide author supervision
Experience in developing energy efficiency improvement projects
Experience in author supervision for construction projects
Submission of tender documents according to regulations and appendices
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated understanding of the specific challenges and opportunities within Latvian educational facilities.
A robust and experienced author supervision team with a proven ability to manage complex construction projects on time and within budget.
A proactive approach to identifying and mitigating potential risks during the design and construction phases.
A clear and compelling narrative on how the proposed energy efficiency measures will translate into tangible, long-term operational savings for Varakļāni Secondary School and Madonas novada pašvaldība.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to minimizing disruption to school operations during construction, ensuring a safe and conducive learning environment for students and staff.
Propose the use of locally sourced materials where feasible, supporting the local economy and reducing the carbon footprint of the project.
Offer to conduct a brief workshop or presentation for school staff on the new energy-efficient systems and their operation.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability (Energy Efficiency Project Development)

Provide detailed case studies of similar projects, quantifying energy savings, cost reductions, and payback periods. Highlight the specific technologies and methodologies proposed for Varakļāni Secondary School.

Technical Capability (Author Supervision)

Present CVs of key personnel, emphasizing their experience in overseeing similar construction projects. Outline a clear project management and quality assurance plan.

Compliance with Submission Requirements

Meticulously follow all instructions in the 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības'. Ensure all documents are correctly formatted, signed, and submitted by the deadline.

Price

While not explicitly stated as a criterion, a competitive and well-justified price is crucial. Ensure the price reflects the quality and expertise offered, and clearly demonstrate the long-term value and ROI.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Analyze 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem'
CriticalHigh effort

This document is likely to contain detailed technical specifications, submission formats, and potentially unstated evaluation criteria. A deep dive is essential for compliance and strategic planning.

Ensures full compliance and identifies subtle requirements that can be leveraged.
Infer Evaluation Criteria and Tailor Response
CriticalHigh effort

Given the absence of explicit criteria, assume a balanced approach. Focus on demonstrating superior technical capability, relevant experience, and a clear understanding of the project's goals. Frame the proposal to address likely evaluation points such as technical solution quality, team expertise, and value for money.

Maximizes scoring potential by proactively addressing likely evaluation priorities.
Showcase School-Specific Energy Efficiency Experience
HighMed effort

Highlight past projects in educational institutions, detailing how energy efficiency measures were implemented, the challenges overcome, and the positive impact on the learning environment and operational costs.

Establishes credibility and demonstrates a tailored understanding of the client's needs.
Develop a Robust Author Supervision Plan
HighMed effort

Outline a detailed plan for author supervision, including communication protocols, site visit schedules, quality control measures, and risk management strategies. Emphasize the team's experience in ensuring project success during the construction phase.

Reassures the client of a well-managed and controlled construction process.
Integrate Subtle Sustainability and Community Benefits
MediumLow effort

Even without explicit requirements, subtly mention the long-term environmental benefits of energy efficiency (reduced carbon footprint) and the positive impact on the learning environment (e.g., improved indoor air quality, thermal comfort).

Demonstrates a forward-thinking and responsible approach, potentially appealing to the client's broader objectives.
Address Potential Disruption to School Operations
MediumMed effort

Propose strategies to minimize disruption to the school's daily activities during construction, such as phased work, off-peak hours, and clear communication with school administration.

Shows consideration for the client's operational continuity and reduces potential client concerns.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most experienced and reliable partner for educational facility energy efficiency upgrades in Latvia.
Emphasize a proactive and collaborative approach to project management, ensuring transparency and client satisfaction throughout the project lifecycle.
Highlight the long-term cost savings and operational benefits that will accrue to the Madonas novada pašvaldība, demonstrating a strong return on investment.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

8 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit tender documents according to the regulations and appendices.
--Tender deadline: 2026-04-27T06:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be able to develop construction projects.
--Must be able to provide author supervision.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Experience in developing energy efficiency improvement projects.
--Experience in author supervision for construction projects.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements mentioned in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169234_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260329124454.pdf -- 97.4 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the development and author supervision of the energy efficiency improvement project for Varakļāni Secondary School in Madona municipality.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
MNP2026_8_nolikums ar pielikumiem_25.03.2026.... -- 155.0 KB

This document contains the regulations and appendices for an open tender procedure for the development of a construction project and author supervision for energy efficiency measures at Varakļāni Secondary School.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender MNP 2026/8, which is an open competition for the development and author supervision of energy efficiency improvement measures for Varakļāni Secondary School.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for architectural design and supervision services for energy efficiency measures at Varakļāni Secondary School is generally well-structured but lacks specific evaluation criteria and has restricted document access. The estimated value is not disclosed, impacting transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal requirements for open procedures, including proper CPV codes and a clear timeline. However, the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria and potential restricted document access could be points of concern regarding procedural fairness and regulatory compliance.

Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, outlining the scope of services. The AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of expected capabilities. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference number, deadlines, and contract duration. Three tender documents are available, which is positive. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the absence of explicit evaluation criteria detracts from completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement, promoting fairness. The AI-extracted requirements are objective. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag raises concerns about full document accessibility for all potential bidders. The undisclosed value also impacts transparency.

Restricted document access
Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement and specifies the contract duration and tender validity. The location of service execution is detailed. However, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests a potential manual submission process, which is less practical than a fully integrated e-submission system.

No e-submission
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date) are logically sequenced. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender focuses on energy efficiency improvements, which aligns with environmental goals. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement criteria, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, limiting its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Open e-procurement procedure
Detailed location information
Logical timeline and deadlines

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Potential for manual submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the tender.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline