Skip to main content
Tenders

Provision of Friends and Family Test (FFT) Surveys Service

Open
Deadline
23 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027003-2026
Value
£120,000
Location
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£120,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Provision of Friends and Family Test (FFT) Surveys Service for the University Hospitals of Northamptonshire (UHN) NHS Group.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed in this section.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed in this section.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed in this section.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed in this section.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed in this section.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for survey services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is concise. However, the absence of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements, as well as missing evaluation criteria, significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, and duration is present. However, the lack of detailed requirements and attached document content limits the overall completeness of the tender package.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. The value is disclosed, and deadlines are provided. The absence of specific tailored requirements indicates a fair approach. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern.

Practicality65/100

The contract start date is specified. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and financing details, along with the potential for a short submission deadline, impacts practicality.

No e-submission
Deadline may be too short
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates appear logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and structure
Open procedure for broad participation
Disclosed estimated value and duration
CPV code provided

Concerns

Lack of detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available for review
No explicit mention of sustainability or innovation

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed requirements and evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Include available tender documents with content for better bidder assessment.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation aspects if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline