Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation of foundation curbs and porches for apartment buildings in Jēkabpils, Jēkabpils Municipality

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
168652
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latvia
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Latvia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation of foundation curbs and porches for apartment buildings in Jēkabpils, Jēkabpils Municipality

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit proposals according to the outlined technical and financial requirements.
--Bidders must adhere to the regulations for public procurement procedures.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds mentioned in provided summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be able to perform the renovation of foundations and entrances for apartment buildings.
--Bidders must comply with the regulations for public procurement procedures.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Technical requirements for the second part of the tender include renovation of foundations, insulation, and curbs.
--Technical requirements for the first part of the tender include renovation of foundation curbs and entrance paving.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Financial requirements for the second part of the tender are outlined.
--Financial proposal requirements for the first part of the tender are outlined.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168652_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260319103612.pdf -- 95.2 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the renovation of foundation curbs and entrance paving for multi-apartment buildings in Jēkabpils, specifically detailing technical and financial proposal requirements.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168652_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260319103612.pdf -- 95.0 KB

This document outlines the technical and financial requirements for the second part of a tender concerning the renovation of foundations, insulation, and curbs for apartment buildings in Jēkabpils.

Nolikums Nr.JKNP 2026/12DOC
NOLIKUMS JKNP 2026_12_ pamatu apmales.doc -- 460.5 KB

This document contains the regulations for a public procurement procedure concerning the renovation of foundations and entrances for apartment buildings in Jēkabpils.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a tender regarding the renovation of foundations and entrances for apartment buildings in Jēkabpils, Latvia.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for foundation curb and entrance renovation in Jēkabpils is generally well-structured, with clear technical documentation for the two parts. However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria, along with potential document access restrictions, slightly impacts its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general public procurement regulations, with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are reported. The main concern is the potential for restricted document access, which could hinder compliance if not resolved.

Restricted document access (potential)
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the technical requirements for both parts of the tender are documented. The conditions for submission are generally outlined, though specific evaluation criteria are missing.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and description. Deadlines and duration are specified. Four documents are attached, covering regulations and technical requirements for both parts. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The division into parts is a common practice. However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria raises concerns about transparency and objective assessment. Document access should be fully open.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. Document URLs are implicitly available through the platform. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and the duration is not specified, which could be improved. Financing information is also absent.

Missing contract duration
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The CPV code is provided, and the status is active. No suspension or disputes are noted. Dates are logical. The lack of disclosed value is the only minor inconsistency.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender focuses solely on the technical renovation of buildings. It is not indicated if the project is EU funded.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear technical documentation for both parts
E-Procurement enabled
Reasonable submission deadline
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access
Missing contract duration and financing information

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the tender.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline