Skip to main content
Tenders

Procurement of computer workstation equipment

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
284443
Value
€600,000
Location
Estonia
Published
March 09, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Cost of the offer100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Tender Opening

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 24, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€600,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Estonia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€87,029
Avg. Bids
2.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
388 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the public procurement is the purchase of large and small laptops, desktop computers, docking stations, monitors, wired keyboards, and wired computer mice (hereinafter referred to as goods). A more detailed description of the subject of the public procurement is provided in the document 'Annex 1. Technical Specification'. A framework agreement for 24 months will be concluded with one bidder as a result of the public procurement. No separate procurement contracts will be signed based on the framework agreement; instead, the framework agreement will be fulfilled based on orders. The contracting authority will place orders for the purchase of goods as needed. The unit prices of the goods submitted in the tender will be valid for the entire duration of the framework agreement. The maximum value of the framework agreement, within which the contracting authority may purchase goods, is EUR 600,000.00 excluding VAT. The contracting authority is not obliged to purchase the full aforementioned amount.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

17 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (8)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS8
--Bidders must follow the tender procedure conditions and required responses as outlined in the Hankepass document (284443_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf).
--Bidders must submit their bid electronically.
--Bidders must refer to the draft framework agreement (Arvuti_Lisa 2_0.docx) in their offer.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to mandatory exclusion grounds as per the Public Procurement Act.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be legally registered entities.
--Bidders must have the necessary permits and licenses to conduct business.
--Bidders must not be in liquidation or bankruptcy proceedings.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be able to supply computer workstation equipment as per the technical specification (Arvuti_Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx).
--Bidders must be able to install and configure the equipment according to the technical specification and the contracting authority's guidelines.
--Bidders must be able to provide the goods, transport, and installation under a framework agreement.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit a cost form detailing unit prices and estimated quantities for computer workstation equipment, including costs for goods, transport, and installation (Arvuti_Lisa 3_0.xlsx).
--The offered price must include all necessary costs.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

VastavustingimusedPDF
284443_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 10.8 KB

This document outlines requirements for joint bids, trade secrets, bid submission conditions, and equivalency for participants in the computer workstation equipment tender.

Lisa 3. Maksumuse vormXLS
Arvuti_Lisa 3_0.xlsx -- 16.7 KB

Bidders must submit a cost form detailing unit prices and estimated quantities for computer workstation equipment, including the cost of goods, transport, and installation.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
284443_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.1 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score, and the submitted item cost must include all necessary expenses.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
284443_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 66.9 KB

The tender pass clarifies the tender procedure conditions and expected responses for the economic operator, but it is filled out electronically, not directly.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Arvuti_Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 48.1 KB

The contracting authority seeks to procure computer workstation equipment, with installation and configuration to be performed according to the technical specifications and the authority's guidelines.

Lisa 2. LepinguprojektDOC
Arvuti_Lisa 2_0.docx -- 45.3 KB

This document is a draft framework agreement outlining the terms and subject matter for the procurement of computer workstation equipment, which bidders must reference in their proposals.

Juhend pakkujaleDOC
Riigihanke Arvutitöökoha seadmete soetamine (... -- 52.4 KB

This guide explains the requirements and submission procedures for bidders in the procurement of computer workstation equipment.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for computer workstation equipment is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a straightforward evaluation process. Key areas for improvement include the explicit mention of sustainability criteria and potentially more detailed guidance on the e-submission process.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard public procurement regulations. Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is provided. No disputes are indicated. The use of a framework agreement without reopening competition is a standard procedure.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, detailing the types of equipment needed. Requirements are documented in various attached files, and evaluation criteria are specified. Conditions for participation are also outlined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the specific details of the 'Mandatory Exclusion Grounds' and 'Eligibility Requirements' are not fully elaborated within the provided text, relying on external documents. The financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Financing information not explicitly detailed.
Fairness85/100

The tender allows for full document access and discloses the estimated value. Deadlines are reasonable, and the primary evaluation criterion (cost) is objective. E-procurement is mandated. The 'Max Participants: 1' is unusual for a framework agreement and could be perceived as restrictive, though it might be justified by the nature of the framework agreement's purpose.

Unusual 'Max Participants: 1' for a framework agreement, potentially limiting competition.
Practicality65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are mandated, which is positive. A contract start date is specified. However, detailed financing information is missing, and while the duration is clear, the practicalities of the order-based execution of the framework agreement could be further clarified.

Lack of detailed financing information.
Further clarification on the practicalities of order-based framework agreement execution could be beneficial.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, but no specific criteria or targets related to environmental or social aspects are detailed within the provided text. There is no explicit mention of innovation focus or EU funding.

Lack of specific details on green procurement criteria.
No explicit mention of social aspects or innovation.

Strengths

Clear and well-structured documentation.
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Objective primary evaluation criterion (cost).
Reasonable deadlines and specified contract start date.

Concerns

Limited detail on sustainability criteria.
Unusual 'Max Participants: 1' for a framework agreement.
Missing detailed financing information.

Recommendations

1. Elaborate on specific green procurement targets and social aspects.
2. Clarify the rationale behind 'Max Participants: 1' for the framework agreement.
3. Provide more detailed information on financing arrangements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline