Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Tender for Main Contract - Dept. 1, Postparken

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
00166324-2026
Value
kr47,000,000
Location
Hovedstaden, Denmark
Published
March 28, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Budget
kr47,000,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Hovedstaden
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Restricted tender

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-13 10:00:00.
--The tender is an 'Open Procedure' but described as 'Begrænset udbud' (Limited tender), implying a selection process for participation.
--Specific submission forms or templates are not detailed, suggesting bidders may need to prepare their own documentation.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds mentioned, but standard exclusion grounds for public procurement are implied.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally registered entities.
--Bidders must not be subject to exclusion grounds.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Proven experience in undertaking similar main contractor construction projects.
--Adequate technical personnel and resources to execute the contract.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Sufficient financial standing to undertake the project.
--No specific financial thresholds or guarantees are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender offers a good foundation with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general public procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an active status. The procedure type is listed as 'Open Procedure' but described as 'Begrænset udbud' (Limited tender), which could imply a pre-selection phase not fully detailed, but does not inherently violate legal compliance if managed correctly. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The title, reference, organization, and estimated value are clearly stated. The AI-extracted requirements provide a reasonable overview of expected capabilities. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value and submission deadline. However, crucial details such as the contract duration and specific submission forms/templates are missing, which hinders a complete understanding of the tender's scope.

Missing contract duration
Specific submission forms or templates are not detailed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an 'Open Procedure' with a disclosed value, promoting transparency. The AI-extracted requirements are general and do not appear tailored to specific companies. The use of e-procurement is noted, which enhances accessibility. However, the lack of detailed evaluation criteria could be perceived as less objective.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. E-procurement is indicated. However, the absence of a contract start date and details on financing, along with the lack of specific submission templates, reduces the overall practicality for bidders.

Missing contract start date
No financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and submission deadline are populated. The status is 'active' and no disputes are reported, indicating logical data. The date of the notice (2026-03-10) and the submission deadline (2026-04-13) are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Estimated value disclosed
CPV code provided
Documents available
E-Procurement indicated

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration
Lack of sustainability focus
Ambiguity in 'Open Procedure' vs. 'Limited tender' description

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Include information on contract duration and start date to improve completeness and practicality.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline