Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction supervision of the 1st and 2nd phase works for the landscaping of the territory of the preschool educational institution 'Pasaulīte'

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
168292
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Zemgale, Latvia
Published
March 15, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 15, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
8 months
Location
Zemgale
Type
Services
69
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€83,543
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
100%
7,536 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction supervision of the 1st and 2nd phase works for the landscaping of the territory of the preschool educational institution 'Pasaulīte'

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168292_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260315160529.pdf -- 101.4 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders participating in a tender for construction supervision services for the improvement of the territory of the preschool educational institution "Pasaulīte" in Bauska municipality.

NolikumsPDF
NOLIKUMS_BNP_2026_34.pdf -- 567.1 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender for the construction supervision of the first and second phases of landscaping work at the "Pasaulīte" preschool educational institution.

PielikumiDOC
Pielikumi_BNP_2026_34.doc -- 196.5 KB

This document contains various appendices and forms related to a tender process, including application forms, declarations of independence, experience descriptions, and specialist lists.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the main data for tender BNP 2026/34, which is an open competition for construction supervision services for the improvement of the "Pasaulīte" preschool territory.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

69
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is moderately complete and fair, with some clarity and practicality concerns. Key details are present, but the lack of disclosed value and explicit evaluation criteria impacts fairness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the provision of a CPV code and a clear procedure (open competition). Deadlines are reasonable. No obvious legal disputes are mentioned. However, the 'Restricted document access' issue noted in the AI check raises a potential flag for full legal compliance if it hinders access to essential tender information.

Restricted document access potentially impacting full legal compliance.
Clarity70/100

The title and description of the services are clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed, impacting overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness65/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, duration, and the organization. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness. While four documents are listed, the 'Restricted document access' suggests potential gaps in what is fully accessible.

Estimated value not disclosed.
Potential restricted access to documents.
Fairness70/100

The tender uses an open procedure and e-procurement, promoting fairness. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the lack of specified evaluation criteria reduce transparency and can be perceived as less fair to potential bidders. There are no explicit requirements tailored to specific companies in the provided text.

Estimated value not disclosed.
No evaluation criteria specified.
Practicality65/100

The tender is flagged as 'E-Procurement', indicating an e-submission process. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned but can be inferred from the duration and submission deadline. Financing information is not disclosed, and there's no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, limiting its practical appeal in these areas.

Financing information not disclosed.
No explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, dates, and CPV code are populated. The tender is active with no listed disputes or suspensions, and the dates appear logically consistent. This category scores well due to the presence of essential data.

Sustainability40/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any requirements for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This lack of focus significantly lowers the sustainability score.

No green procurement, social, or innovation criteria.
Not indicated as EU funded.

Strengths

Clear title and description of services.
E-Procurement enabled.
Reasonable submission deadline.
CPV code provided.

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed.
Missing evaluation criteria.
Potential restricted document access.
Lack of sustainability focus.

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria for bidder submissions.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline