Skip to main content
Tenders

Development of the general part of the description of the social services effectiveness evaluation system

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
167574
Value
€51,240
Location
Latvia
Published
March 10, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€51,240
Duration
14 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€45,411
Avg. Bids
1.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
98%
1,077 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development of the general part of the description of the social services effectiveness evaluation system
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-10T09:00:00.
--Bids must be submitted in the specified format and language(s) as per the tender documents.
--All required documentation, including technical and financial proposals, must be included.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The bidder must not be subject to any of the exclusion grounds specified in the tender documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must be legally registered and authorized to operate in their country of establishment.
--The bidder must have the necessary legal capacity to enter into contracts.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must demonstrate experience in developing similar systems or frameworks.
--The bidder must provide a detailed technical proposal outlining their approach to developing the general part of the social services effectiveness evaluation system.
--The bidder must propose a team with relevant expertise and qualifications.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must demonstrate sufficient financial stability to undertake the project.
--[Specific financial requirements will be detailed in the tender documents]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167574_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260310050852.pdf -- 94.2 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the development of a general part of the social services effectiveness evaluation system, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation methods.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums 06_03_2026.docx -- 190.8 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the development of the general part of the social services effectiveness evaluation system, funded by the European Social Fund Plus and state budget.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a public procurement tender regarding the development of a general part of the description for a social services effectiveness evaluation system, issued by the Ministry of Welfare of Latvia.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the development of a social services effectiveness evaluation system description is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting fairness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, a specified CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the issuing authority.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria in the provided information reduces overall clarity for bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. Three tender documents are listed, suggesting a good level of detail. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and the restricted access to full documentation prevent a higher score.

Restricted document access
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and uses an e-procurement system, which promotes fairness. The AI-extracted requirements are objective. However, restricted document access is a significant concern, potentially limiting fair competition.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses an e-procurement system, indicating a modern submission process. The contract duration is specified. However, the AI-extracted requirements mention 'e-submission' but the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', creating ambiguity. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Ambiguity regarding e-submission
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The CPV code is provided.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is identified as 'EU Funded' and 'E-Procurement', 'WTO/GPA'. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, leading to a moderate score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Specified CPV code and NUTS code
Active e-procurement system
Disclosed estimated value

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Provide full access to all tender documents.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Incorporate specific sustainability or innovation requirements if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline