Skip to main content
Tenders

Recruitment Preferred Provider List

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
024232-2026
Value
£360,000
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 14, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£360,000
Duration
24 months
Location
North East England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

We are aiming to introduce a Preferred Supplier List for our recruitment needs at WCHG to help manage spend and ensure quality candidates who align with our corporate values. Please note there is no guarantee of spend under this approved provider list. The values stated on this notice are not accurate as there is no guarantee of work.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a Recruitment Preferred Provider List is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and technical requirements, and the financial information is presented with a significant disclaimer.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and includes a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure. No disputes are reported. The procedure is clearly defined as 'Open procedure'.

Clarity80/100

The description clearly states the aim of establishing a Preferred Supplier List to manage spend and ensure quality candidates aligned with corporate values. However, the absence of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements, along with missing evaluation criteria, reduces overall clarity.

No specific eligibility requirements listed
No specific technical capability requirements listed
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and deadlines are present. However, the lack of detailed requirements and the disclaimer about the accuracy of the stated value and guarantee of work significantly impact completeness.

No specific requirements listed (eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Disclaimer regarding the accuracy of the estimated value and guarantee of work
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and deadlines are provided. The primary concern for fairness is the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation, which could lead to subjective selection. The disclaimer about the value also introduces some uncertainty.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the URL for tender documents limits practicality. The financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission specified
No document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical and consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear objective for Preferred Provider List
Open procedure for broad participation
Proper CPV code provided
Estimated value and duration specified

Concerns

Lack of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements
Missing evaluation criteria
Disclaimer on estimated value and guarantee of work
No explicit mention of e-submission or document URLs

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Clearly define objective evaluation criteria.
3. Provide direct links to tender documents and clarify the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline